State of Maharashtra vs Nilesh Laxmanrao Deshmukh — 880/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),22(c),29. Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHNG010142262025
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
Filing Number
6427/2025
Filing Date
04-11-2025
Registration No
880/2025
Registration Date
06-11-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
FIR Details
FIR Number
366
Police Station
Imamwada
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Nilesh Laxmanrao Deshmukh
Pranay urf Sumit Gopalgao Gaidhane
Ashish Prakash Madavi
Shubham urf Bhurya Rajesh Tidake
Shanu (Absconding)
Hearing History
Judge: 25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Production of Accused
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 23-04-2026 | Order |
| 18-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 06-04-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 30-03-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Special Court (NDPS Act) at Nagpur granted the application and allowed release of the seized Maruti Suzuki vehicle (Reg. No. MH-49-BB-0613) to applicant Nilesh S/o Laxman Deshmukh in interim custody. The vehicle was released on executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 6,00,000 with one or two solvent sureties of equal amount, with conditions that the applicant cannot transfer, sell, mortgage, or alter the vehicle's appearance without court permission, and must produce it as and when directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Special Court (NDPS Act) at Nagpur granted the application and allowed release of the seized Maruti Suzuki vehicle (Reg. No. MH-49-BB-0613) to applicant Nilesh S/o Laxman Deshmukh in interim custody. The vehicle was released on executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 6,00,000 with one or two solvent sureties of equal amount, with conditions that the applicant cannot transfer, sell, mortgage, or alter the vehicle's appearance without court permission, and must produce it as and when directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts