Shubham Arun Singnath, (Injured) P.S.Yashodhara Nagar 459/ vs Rajat Ashok Agrawal — 873/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP. M.A.

CNR: MHNG010124562025

Filing Number

7297/2025

Filing Date

30-Sep-2025

Registration No

873/2025

Registration Date

13-Oct-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

36-M.A.C.T. Court No.4

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shubham Arun Singnath, (Injured) P.S.Yashodhara Nagar 459/

  2. 2.Samyak Bhagwan Patil, (Injured)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajat Ashok Agrawal

  2. 2.The TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT-4, Nagpur) disposed of Miscellaneous Application No. 873/2025 and ordered it to be consolidated with the newly instituted Motor Accident Claim Petition (MACP) arising from the same accident. The tribunal found that both the DAR petition and MACP applications stemmed from identical circumstances, warranting their consolidation for joint registration and proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Steps

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 873/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT-4, Nagpur) disposed of Miscellaneous Application No. 873/2025 and ordered it to be consolidated with the newly instituted Motor Accident Claim Petition (MACP) arising from the same accident. The tribunal found that both the DAR petition and MACP applications stemmed from identical circumstances, warranting their consolidation for joint registration and proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case