Pravin Purushottam Mundhada vs The Nagpur Municipal Corporation Advocate - Girish A Kunte — 277/2025
Case under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Section 81F. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHNG010116952025
e-Filing Number
12-09-2025
Filing Number
6901/2025
Filing Date
12-Sep-2025
Registration No
277/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pravin Purushottam Mundhada
Adv. S.W.Sambre
-
2.Sheikh Babar Sheikh Chand
Adv. M.V.Raut
-
3.Anil Ramdayal Mahendra
Adv. M.V.Raut
-
4.Nilesh Laxman Kumbhalkar
Adv. M.V.Raut
-
5.Pournima Sanjay Behere
Adv. M.V.Raut
-
6.Vikas Prabhakar Petkar
Adv. M.V.Raut
-
7.Madhumilind Agro Agency Through Nitin Manoharrao Naik
Adv. M.V.Raut
-
8.Shailesh Ramkishore Yadav
Adv. M.V.Raut
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Nagpur Municipal Corporation Advocate - Girish A Kunte
-
2.Dy Municipal Commissioner Estate
Adv. Girish A Kunte
-
3.Abhyankar Smarak Trust
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The District Court of Nagpur dismissed eight consolidated appeals challenging eviction notices issued by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) under Section 81-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. The court held that the Abhyankar Smarak Trust's lease of the disputed property expired in 1967 and was never renewed, rendering both the trust and its tenants (the appellants) unauthorized occupants. Since the lease had lapsed 58 years prior and the appellants possessed no valid legal status, the court upheld the NMC's eviction notice as legal and justified, rejecting arguments that the property was required for public purpose needed specification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
06-May-2026
Judgment
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
04-May-2026
Judgment
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgment
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgment
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
20-Apr-2026
Judgment
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
06-Apr-2026
Judgment
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
17-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
05-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
22-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
16-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
08-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
05-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
03-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
24-Dec-2025
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
22-Dec-2025
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
19-Dec-2025
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
17-Dec-2025
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
11-Dec-2025
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
06-Dec-2025
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
29-Nov-2025
Arguments
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
15-Nov-2025
Arguments
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
09-Oct-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
15-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
15-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 277/2025
Summary: The District Court of Nagpur dismissed eight consolidated appeals challenging eviction notices issued by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) under Section 81-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act. The court held that the Abhyankar Smarak Trust's lease of the disputed property expired in 1967 and was never renewed, rendering both the trust and its tenants (the appellants) unauthorized occupants. Since the lease had lapsed 58 years prior and the appellants possessed no valid legal status, the court upheld the NMC's eviction notice as legal and justified, rejecting arguments that the property was required for public purpose needed specification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts