State of Maharashtra vs Anwaz Anwar Khan — 535/2023
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c), 22(b), 29. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
Spl.Case
CNR: MHNG010111962023
Filing Number
4695/2023
Filing Date
04-Oct-2023
Registration No
535/2023
Registration Date
04-Oct-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Last updated 12-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
661
Police Station
Tahasil
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anwaz Anwar Khan
-
2.Shadib Shiekh s/o Ijaj Sheikh
-
3.Nehal Ahmad s/o Khalil Ahmad
Case History
-
14-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
21-Jan-2026
Appearance
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
26-Nov-2025
Appearance
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
30-Sep-2025
Appearance
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
12-Aug-2025
Appearance
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
01-Jul-2025
Appearance
District Judge 7 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
07-May-2025
Appearance
District Judge 4 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
12-Mar-2025
Appearance
District Judge 4 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
21-Jan-2025
Appearance
District Judge 5 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
27-Nov-2024
Appearance
District Judge 7 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
14-Oct-2024
Appearance
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
26-Aug-2024
Appearance
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
12-Jul-2024
Appearance
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
18-May-2024
Appearance
District Judge 7 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
22-Mar-2024
Appearance
District Judge 7 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
29-Jan-2024
Appearance
District Judge 7 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
14-Dec-2023
Appearance
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
24-Nov-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application filed by Nehal Khalil Ahmad Sayani for interim custody of her seized REDMI 9 mobile handset in an NDPS case (Crime No. 661/2023) was rejected. The Special Judge (NDPS Court) Nagpur held that the mobile contains crucial electronic evidence including conversion data and financial transactions related to drugs, and therefore cannot be released to the accused due to risk of tampering or destruction of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Nov-2023
Appearance
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
08-Nov-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
30-Oct-2023
Filing of Surety
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
26-Oct-2023
Filing of Surety
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
25-Oct-2023
Order
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
23-Oct-2023
Hearing
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
21-Oct-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
20-Oct-2023
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
19-Oct-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
19-Oct-2023
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
18-Oct-2023
Order
District Judge 3 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
17-Oct-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Oct-2023
Hearing
District Judge 4 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
13-Oct-2023
Order
District Judge 4 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
11-Oct-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge 4 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
06-Oct-2023
Reply/Say
District Judge 4 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
04-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 535/2023
Summary: The application filed by Nehal Khalil Ahmad Sayani for interim custody of her seized REDMI 9 mobile handset in an NDPS case (Crime No. 661/2023) was rejected. The Special Judge (NDPS Court) Nagpur held that the mobile contains crucial electronic evidence including conversion data and financial transactions related to drugs, and therefore cannot be released to the accused due to risk of tampering or destruction of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts