Hemlata Wd/o Sudhakar Pathe vs Abir Tours and Travels Proprietor Pravin C Ingole — 1060/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010106162024

e-Filing Number

03-10-2024

Filing Number

6059/2024

Filing Date

05-Oct-2024

Registration No

1060/2024

Registration Date

05-Oct-2024

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

31-M.A.C.T. Court No.2

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hemlata Wd/o Sudhakar Pathe

    Adv. Prakash Vishwanath Gupta

  2. 2.Vanshika D/o Sudhakar Pathe

    Adv. Prakash Vishwanath Gupta

  3. 3.Abhishek S/o Sudhakar Pathe

    Adv. Prakash Vishwanath Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abir Tours and Travels Proprietor Pravin C Ingole

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    This document records witness testimony in a motor accident claims petition, not a court order with a final judgment. Witness No. 2 (Radheshyam Arunrao Lakhwade), a labour contractor, testified that the deceased worked as a Loom Assistant earning Rs. 21,500/- gross salary from November 2023, and provided salary slips as evidence. The witness denied allegations during cross-examination that the deceased was not an employee or that documents were fabricated. The testimony was recorded and admitted as correct on 24/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Amended Plaint

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  13. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  14. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  17. 28-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  18. 28-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  19. 18-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  20. 17-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  21. 25-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 05-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1060/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document records witness testimony in a motor accident claims petition, not a court order with a final judgment. Witness No. 2 (Radheshyam Arunrao Lakhwade), a labour contractor, testified that the deceased worked as a Loom Assistant earning Rs. 21,500/- gross salary from November 2023, and provided salary slips as evidence. The witness denied allegations during cross-examination that the deceased was not an employee or that documents were fabricated. The testimony was recorded and admitted as correct on 24/03/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case