Deepak Dyandev Kamble vs Parag Pralhad Potdar Advocate - S. C. P. Mishra — 938/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHNG010103702022
Filing Number
6061/2022
Filing Date
13-Oct-2022
Registration No
938/2022
Registration Date
14-Oct-2022
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
30-M.A.C.T. Court No.1
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Deepak Dyandev Kamble
Adv. G. N. Shinde
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parag Pralhad Potdar Advocate - S. C. P. Mishra
-
2.Eugene Alie Michael
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nagpur awarded Rs. 2,25,000 in compensation to Deepak Kamble for grievous injuries (bilateral leg fractures) sustained in a motorcycle accident caused by the rash and negligent driving of respondent No. 1. The tribunal rejected the petitioner's claim for permanent disability compensation since he fully recovered and continued working, but awarded compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, loss of leave, and inconvenience, along with 7.5% annual interest from the claim date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgment
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgment
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
05-Mar-2026
Arguments
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
12-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
11-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
15-Oct-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
28-Aug-2025
Reply/Say
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
08-Aug-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
18-Jun-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Jun-2025
Compliance
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
21-Apr-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
13-Feb-2025
Order
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
17-Jan-2025
Reply/Say
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
21-Nov-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
11-Nov-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
28-Aug-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
20-Jul-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
22-Jun-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
19-Apr-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
26-Mar-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
03-Feb-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
03-Jan-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Jan-2024
Issues
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
28-Nov-2023
Nfl Hearing
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
27-Oct-2023
Nfl Hearing
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
02-Sep-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-Sep-2023
Compliance
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
08-Aug-2023
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
06-Jul-2023
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
13-Jun-2023
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
11-Apr-2023
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
16-Feb-2023
Ex-Parte Order
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
04-Jan-2023
Summons_Ready
M.A.C.T. Court No.1
-
16-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 938/2022
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nagpur awarded Rs. 2,25,000 in compensation to Deepak Kamble for grievous injuries (bilateral leg fractures) sustained in a motorcycle accident caused by the rash and negligent driving of respondent No. 1. The tribunal rejected the petitioner's claim for permanent disability compensation since he fully recovered and continued working, but awarded compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses, loss of leave, and inconvenience, along with 7.5% annual interest from the claim date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts