Vijay Shankarrao Wankhede vs The TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Adv. Choube — 792/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010079122025

Reply/Say

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

4784/2025

Filing Date

26-06-2025

Registration No

792/2025

Registration Date

07-07-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

30-M.A.C.T. COURT NO.1

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Vijay Shankarrao Wankhede

Adv. L.K.Ramteke

Sunita Shankarrao Wankhede

Pratik Shankarrao Wankhede

Respondent(s)

The TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Adv. Choube

Pratik Sunil Rahate

Hearing History

Judge: 30-M.A.C.T. COURT NO.1

17-04-2026

Reply/Say

09-04-2026

Reply/Say

25-03-2026

Reply/Say

10-03-2026

Amended Plaint

24-02-2026

Order

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-1, Nagpur allowed the application filed by Vaishali under Order 1 Rule 10 to be added as a party to the motor accident compensation claim. The tribunal found prima facie evidence (Aadhar card, marriage photographs, newspaper report, compromise deed, and bank statement showing ₹2,50,000 credited by the deceased's employer) establishing her marital relationship with the deceased, making her a necessary party to the proceedings. The original petitioners were directed to amend the petition to include Vaishali as a party and file the amended plaint at the earliest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-1, Nagpur allowed the application filed by Vaishali under Order 1 Rule 10 to be added as a party to the motor accident compensation claim. The tribunal found prima facie evidence (Aadhar card, marriage photographs, newspaper report, compromise deed, and bank statement showing ₹2,50,000 credited by the deceased's employer) establishing her marital relationship with the deceased, making her a necessary party to the proceedings. The original petitioners were directed to amend the petition to include Vaishali as a party and file the amended plaint at the earliest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case