Vijay Shankarrao Wankhede vs The TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Adv. Choube — 792/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Reply/Say Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010079122025

Filing Number

4784/2025

Filing Date

26-Jun-2025

Registration No

792/2025

Registration Date

07-Jul-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

30-M.A.C.T. Court No.1

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Shankarrao Wankhede

    Adv. L.K.Ramteke

  2. 2.Sunita Shankarrao Wankhede

  3. 3.Pratik Shankarrao Wankhede

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Adv. Choube

  2. 2.Pratik Sunil Rahate

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-1, Nagpur allowed the application filed by Vaishali under Order 1 Rule 10 to be added as a party to the motor accident compensation claim. The tribunal found prima facie evidence (Aadhar card, marriage photographs, newspaper report, compromise deed, and bank statement showing ₹2,50,000 credited by the deceased's employer) establishing her marital relationship with the deceased, making her a necessary party to the proceedings. The original petitioners were directed to amend the petition to include Vaishali as a party and file the amended plaint at the earliest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Amended Plaint

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  10. 13-Dec-2025

    Supply of Copies

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Supply of Copies

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Supply of Copies

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  13. 04-Dec-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  14. 21-Nov-2025

    Reply/Say

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  15. 28-Oct-2025

    Ex-Parte Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  16. 28-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 792/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-1, Nagpur allowed the application filed by Vaishali under Order 1 Rule 10 to be added as a party to the motor accident compensation claim. The tribunal found prima facie evidence (Aadhar card, marriage photographs, newspaper report, compromise deed, and bank statement showing ₹2,50,000 credited by the deceased's employer) establishing her marital relationship with the deceased, making her a necessary party to the proceedings. The original petitioners were directed to amend the petition to include Vaishali as a party and file the amended plaint at the earliest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case