Sunita Surendra Markam vs Prashant Dhamraj Kokade Advocate - P.S.Wathore — 965/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHNG010060672022
Filing Number
3377/2022
Filing Date
20-Jun-2022
Registration No
965/2022
Registration Date
17-Oct-2022
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
31-M.A.C.T. Court No.2
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sunita Surendra Markam
Adv. P. S. Mirache
-
2.Vishal Surendra Markam
Adv. P. S. Mirache
-
3.Vishal Surendra Markam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prashant Dhamraj Kokade Advocate - P.S.Wathore
-
2.Dasaram Fulbale
Adv. P.S.Wathore
-
3.Jitendra Dasaram Fulbale
Adv. P.S.Wathore
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
13-Apr-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
02-Apr-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
12-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
25-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
11-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
30-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
21-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
16-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
07-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
17-Dec-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Summary: In Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Nagpur, M.A. Claim Petition No. 965/22, the witness testimony of Sunita Markam (petitioner) was recorded on 17/12/2025 in her claim for compensation following her husband's death in a motor accident. The petitioner testified that her deceased husband was a laborer earning daily wages of Rs.300, and the petition proceeded ex-parte against Respondent No.1. Cross-examination was completed and the witness testimony was admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
29-Oct-2025
Compliance
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
17-Oct-2025
Compliance
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
04-Oct-2025
Compliance
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
20-Sep-2025
Compliance
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
30-Jun-2025
Judgment
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
16-Jun-2025
Judgment
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
09-Jun-2025
Arguments
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
07-May-2025
Arguments
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
29-Apr-2025
Arguments
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
09-Apr-2025
Order
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
26-Mar-2025
Order
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
27-Feb-2025
Compliance
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
18-Feb-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
14-Feb-2025
Arguments
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
28-Jan-2025
Defence Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
15-Jan-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
15-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
14-Oct-2024
No W.S. Order
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
05-Sep-2024
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
01-Aug-2024
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
08-Jul-2024
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
26-Apr-2024
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
14-Mar-2024
Supply of Copies
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
20-Feb-2024
Reply/Say
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
15-Jan-2024
Reply/Say
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
01-Dec-2023
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
19-Oct-2023
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
18-Sep-2023
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
16-Aug-2023
Written Statement
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
14-Jul-2023
Awaiting Notice
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
20-Apr-2023
Awaiting Notice
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
03-Feb-2023
Awaiting Notice
M.A.C.T. Court No.2
-
19-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 965/2022
Summary: In Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Nagpur, M.A. Claim Petition No. 965/22, the witness testimony of Sunita Markam (petitioner) was recorded on 17/12/2025 in her claim for compensation following her husband's death in a motor accident. The petitioner testified that her deceased husband was a laborer earning daily wages of Rs.300, and the petition proceeded ex-parte against Respondent No.1. Cross-examination was completed and the witness testimony was admitted as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts