Surekha Ramdas Raut vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Advocate - S. G. Kasbekar — 450/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010058212023

Filing Number

3339/2023

Filing Date

05-Jun-2023

Registration No

450/2023

Registration Date

06-Jun-2023

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

30-M.A.C.T. Court No.1

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Surekha Ramdas Raut

    Adv. P. S. Mirache

  2. 2.Himanshu Ramdas Raut

  3. 3.Shrishti Ramdas Raut

  4. 4.Gitabai Sitaram Raut

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Advocate - S. G. Kasbekar

  2. 2.M/s. Nagarjun Training Institute

    Adv. A. P. Thakare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nagpur awarded ₹46,51,702 compensation to the family of Ramdas Raut, who died in a vehicular accident caused by a rash and negligent ambulance driver. The tribunal found the insurance company and vehicle owner jointly liable, rejecting their defense that the deceased was responsible, and awarded interest at 7.5% per annum from the petition date until final realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  9. 20-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  15. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  16. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  17. 17-Oct-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  18. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  19. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  20. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  21. 24-Jul-2025

    Amended Plaint

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  22. 14-Jul-2025

    Reply/Say

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  24. 05-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  25. 11-Apr-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  26. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  27. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  28. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  29. 03-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  30. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  31. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  32. 09-Jan-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  33. 09-Jan-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  34. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  35. 21-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  36. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  37. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  38. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  39. 29-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  40. 22-Apr-2024

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  41. 02-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  42. 29-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  43. 12-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  44. 04-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  45. 13-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  46. 08-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  47. 05-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 450/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nagpur awarded ₹46,51,702 compensation to the family of Ramdas Raut, who died in a vehicular accident caused by a rash and negligent ambulance driver. The tribunal found the insurance company and vehicle owner jointly liable, rejecting their defense that the deceased was responsible, and awarded interest at 7.5% per annum from the petition date until final realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case