Ardhay Anil Parkhi vs The IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. Advocate - M. A. Pradhan — 426/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,,279,337,338,304-A. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010057232022

Filing Number

3189/2022

Filing Date

10-Jun-2022

Registration No

426/2022

Registration Date

13-Jun-2022

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

31-M.A.C.T. Court No.2

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,,279,337,338,304-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ardhay Anil Parkhi

    Adv. P. S. Mirache

  2. 2.Anil Marotrao Parkhi

    Adv. P. S. Mirache

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. Advocate - M. A. Pradhan

  2. 2.Ravindrakumar Kharwade

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur admitted ten documents (Exhibits 16-25) into evidence in MA Claim Petition No. 426/22, including Form AA, FIR, driving license, insurance policy, discharge summary, and identity documents. The tribunal applied summary procedure under Section 169-18 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, admitting medical bills and vouchers while excluding disability and income certificates without formal proof. Witness Anil Marotrao Parkhi testified that his son Ardhay sustained grievous injuries (face, chest, back) in the accident and was hospitalized, while cross-examination addressed liability and claim validity issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  13. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  14. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  15. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  16. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  17. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  18. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  19. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  20. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  21. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  22. 31-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  23. 01-Aug-2024

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  24. 27-Jun-2024

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  25. 16-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  26. 20-Feb-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  27. 09-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  28. 07-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  29. 02-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  30. 02-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  31. 06-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  32. 04-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  33. 14-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  34. 11-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 10-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 426/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur admitted ten documents (Exhibits 16-25) into evidence in MA Claim Petition No. 426/22, including Form AA, FIR, driving license, insurance policy, discharge summary, and identity documents. The tribunal applied summary procedure under Section 169-18 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, admitting medical bills and vouchers while excluding disability and income certificates without formal proof. Witness Anil Marotrao Parkhi testified that his son Ardhay sustained grievous injuries (face, chest, back) in the accident and was hospitalized, while cross-examination addressed liability and claim validity issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case