Anil Marotrao Parkhi vs The IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. Advocate - M. A. Pradhan — 424/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,,279,337,338,304-A. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Defence Evidence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010057212022

Filing Number

3187/2022

Filing Date

10-Jun-2022

Registration No

424/2022

Registration Date

13-Jun-2022

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

31-M.A.C.T. Court No.2

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,,279,337,338,304-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Marotrao Parkhi

    Adv. P. S. Mirache

  2. 2.Radheya Anil Parkhi

    Adv. P. S. Mirache

  3. 3.Ardhay Anil Parkhi

    Adv. P. S. Mirache

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. Advocate - M. A. Pradhan

  2. 2.Ravindrakumar Kharwade

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: In Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Petition No. 424/22 at Nagpur, the tribunal admitted 13 documents (Exhibits 16-28) including FIR copies, insurance policy, driving license, and bank records under summary procedure per M.V. Act 1988. The petitioner Anil Parkhi, who was driving a neighbor's vehicle involved in an accident that killed his wife (a school teacher earning Rs. 15,000/month), gave evidence on affidavit; he denied allegations of drunk driving, vehicle hire, and false claims, while confirming a valid driving license and that an offense was registered. The case proceeded with cross-examination completed and one respondent (N.A. No. 2) proceeded ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  13. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  14. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  15. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  16. 16-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  17. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  18. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  19. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  20. 22-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  21. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  22. 31-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  23. 01-Aug-2024

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  24. 27-Jun-2024

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  25. 16-Apr-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  26. 20-Feb-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  27. 09-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  28. 07-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  29. 02-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  30. 02-Aug-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  31. 06-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  32. 04-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  33. 14-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.2

  34. 11-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 10-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 424/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Petition No. 424/22 at Nagpur, the tribunal admitted 13 documents (Exhibits 16-28) including FIR copies, insurance policy, driving license, and bank records under summary procedure per M.V. Act 1988. The petitioner Anil Parkhi, who was driving a neighbor's vehicle involved in an accident that killed his wife (a school teacher earning Rs. 15,000/month), gave evidence on affidavit; he denied allegations of drunk driving, vehicle hire, and false claims, while confirming a valid driving license and that an offense was registered. The case proceeded with cross-examination completed and one respondent (N.A. No. 2) proceeded ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case