Rajendra Narayan Prasad Gupta(Legal Heir) vs Abhay Satya Narayan Reddy and 1 Advocate - Lubesh Chakradhar Meshram — 493/2017

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010051582017

Filing Number

4930/2017

Filing Date

07-Jun-2017

Registration No

493/2017

Registration Date

08-Jun-2017

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajendra Narayan Prasad Gupta(Legal Heir)

    Adv. P. S. Mirache1.

  2. 2.Nita Rajendra Gupta

    Adv. P. S. Mirache1.

  3. 3.Abhay Rajendra Gupta

    Adv. P. S. Mirache1.

  4. 4.Pragati Rajendra Gupta

    Adv. P. S. Mirache1.

  5. 5.Diksha Rajendra Gupta

    Adv. P. S. Mirache

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abhay Satya Narayan Reddy and 1 Advocate - Lubesh Chakradhar Meshram

  2. 2.The Divisional Manager

    Adv. C. B. Pande

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  10. 29-Sep-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  11. 04-Sep-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  12. 28-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  13. 31-Jul-2025

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  14. 15-Jul-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  15. 12-Jun-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  16. 24-Apr-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  17. 11-Apr-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  18. 02-Apr-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: The MACT-3 Nagpur court recorded the deposition of Dr. Mohd. Faisal Abdul Salim (Witness No. 4 for petitioner) via video conferencing on 02.04.2025 in case C.P. No. 493/2017 (Rajendra vs. Abhay). The witness testified regarding hospital and pharmacy bills totaling Rs. 35,000 for the petitioner's treatment for amputation and diabetes in August 2018, with documents marked as Exhibits 53 and 54. During cross-examination by Respondent No. 2's counsel, the witness refuted allegations of filing incomplete records or deposing falsely, while Respondent No. 1's counsel was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 02-Apr-2025

    Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  20. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  21. 05-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  22. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  23. 18-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  24. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  25. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  26. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  27. 19-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  28. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  29. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  30. 19-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  31. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  32. 18-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  33. 18-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  34. 24-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  35. 19-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  36. 21-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  37. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  38. 21-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  39. 21-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  40. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  41. 15-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  42. 21-Feb-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  43. 21-Jan-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  44. 21-Dec-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  45. 29-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  46. 15-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  47. 01-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  48. 03-Oct-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  49. 15-Sep-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  50. 02-Sep-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  51. 19-Aug-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  52. 19-Jul-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  53. 29-Jun-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  54. 29-Apr-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  55. 15-Mar-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  56. 15-Feb-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  57. 15-Jan-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  58. 15-Dec-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  59. 20-Nov-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  60. 20-Oct-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  61. 21-Sep-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  62. 23-Aug-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  63. 12-Jul-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  64. 10-Jun-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  65. 28-Apr-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  66. 24-Mar-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  67. 09-Mar-2021

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  68. 01-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  69. 22-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  70. 22-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  71. 22-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  72. 22-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  73. 18-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  74. 18-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  75. 18-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  76. 18-Sep-2019

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  77. 18-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  78. 18-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  79. 18-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.3

  80. 26-Oct-2018

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  81. 05-Apr-2018

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  82. 17-Mar-2018

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  83. 17-Mar-2018

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  84. 26-Feb-2018

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  85. 18-Jan-2018

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  86. 16-Nov-2017

    Reply/Say

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  87. 20-Sep-2017

    Ex-Parte Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.1

  88. 21-Jun-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  89. 07-Jun-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 493/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The MACT-3 Nagpur court recorded the deposition of Dr. Mohd. Faisal Abdul Salim (Witness No. 4 for petitioner) via video conferencing on 02.04.2025 in case C.P. No. 493/2017 (Rajendra vs. Abhay). The witness testified regarding hospital and pharmacy bills totaling Rs. 35,000 for the petitioner's treatment for amputation and diabetes in August 2018, with documents marked as Exhibits 53 and 54. During cross-examination by Respondent No. 2's counsel, the witness refuted allegations of filing incomplete records or deposing falsely, while Respondent No. 1's counsel was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case