Purushottam S/o Janardhan Satone vs Mr Mahendra Shamrao Mahure Advocate - Akash B. Pawar — 460/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHNG010049152025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
12-04-2025
Filing Number
2887/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
460/2025
Registration Date
17-04-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
36-M.A.C.T. COURT NO.4
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Purushottam S/o Janardhan Satone
Adv. P. S. Mirache
Om S/o Bhaskarrao Satone
Adv. P S Mirache
Respondent(s)
Mr Mahendra Shamrao Mahure Advocate - Akash B. Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 36-M.A.C.T. COURT NO.4
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Filing of Affidavit
Issues
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Filing of Affidavit |
| 24-02-2026 | Issues |
| 03-01-2026 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claims Petition (MACP 460/2025) proceeding before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nagpur. The document records the witness examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the claimant, where certified documents (FIR, panchanama, postmortem report, insurance policy) were exhibited as evidence in a fatal motor vehicle accident case. The cross-examination reveals disputes regarding vehicle identification, accident circumstances, and the deceased's income/occupation, with the claimant maintaining dependency claims against the respondent insurer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claims Petition (MACP 460/2025) proceeding before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nagpur. The document records the witness examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the claimant, where certified documents (FIR, panchanama, postmortem report, insurance policy) were exhibited as evidence in a fatal motor vehicle accident case. The cross-examination reveals disputes regarding vehicle identification, accident circumstances, and the deceased's income/occupation, with the claimant maintaining dependency claims against the respondent insurer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts