Purushottam S/o Janardhan Satone vs Mr Mahendra Shamrao Mahure Advocate - Akash B. Pawar — 460/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010049152025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

12-04-2025

Filing Number

2887/2025

Filing Date

16-04-2025

Registration No

460/2025

Registration Date

17-04-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

36-M.A.C.T. COURT NO.4

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Purushottam S/o Janardhan Satone

Adv. P. S. Mirache

Om S/o Bhaskarrao Satone

Adv. P S Mirache

Respondent(s)

Mr Mahendra Shamrao Mahure Advocate - Akash B. Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 36-M.A.C.T. COURT NO.4

09-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-03-2026

Evidence

27-02-2026

Filing of Affidavit

24-02-2026

Issues

03-01-2026

Written Statement

Interim Orders

09-04-2026
Evidence

Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claims Petition (MACP 460/2025) proceeding before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nagpur. The document records the witness examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the claimant, where certified documents (FIR, panchanama, postmortem report, insurance policy) were exhibited as evidence in a fatal motor vehicle accident case. The cross-examination reveals disputes regarding vehicle identification, accident circumstances, and the deceased's income/occupation, with the claimant maintaining dependency claims against the respondent insurer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This is a Motor Accident Claims Petition (MACP 460/2025) proceeding before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Nagpur. The document records the witness examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the claimant, where certified documents (FIR, panchanama, postmortem report, insurance policy) were exhibited as evidence in a fatal motor vehicle accident case. The cross-examination reveals disputes regarding vehicle identification, accident circumstances, and the deceased's income/occupation, with the claimant maintaining dependency claims against the respondent insurer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case