Nikita Anil Kalbande vs Rita Industries, CEO Vishal Dhiraj Shah Advocate - Exparty — 395/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

M.A.C.P.

CNR: MHNG010046362021

Filing Number

2126/2021

Filing Date

04-May-2021

Registration No

395/2021

Registration Date

17-Jun-2021

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

36-M.A.C.T. Court No.4

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nikita Anil Kalbande

    Adv. D. G. Paunikar

  2. 2.Priyanka Krunal Moundekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rita Industries, CEO Vishal Dhiraj Shah Advocate - Exparty

  2. 2.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. C. M. Anjankar

  3. 3.The Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. D. M. Paranjpe

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur awarded Rs. 9,80,100 in compensation to two married daughters for their mother's death in a motor vehicle accident, holding that the accident resulted from composite negligence of both the truck driver (who illegally parked) and car driver (who collided). The tribunal established that as surviving legal heirs, the daughters were entitled to claim compensation despite being married and residing separately, rejecting the insurance companies' dependency argument and applying recent Supreme Court precedent on liberal interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act's beneficent provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Disposed

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  13. 22-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  14. 13-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  15. 07-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  16. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  17. 16-Sep-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  19. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  20. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  21. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  22. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  23. 06-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  24. 09-Apr-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  25. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  26. 05-Apr-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  27. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  28. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  29. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  30. 07-Feb-2025

    Filing of Affidavit

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  31. 08-Jan-2025

    Filing of Affidavit

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  32. 04-Dec-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  33. 04-Nov-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  34. 19-Oct-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  35. 20-Aug-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  36. 11-Jul-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  37. 18-Mar-2024

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  38. 10-Jan-2024

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  39. 11-Oct-2023

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  40. 02-Aug-2023

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  41. 28-Jun-2023

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  42. 01-Apr-2023

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  43. 24-Feb-2023

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  44. 18-Jan-2023

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  45. 17-Oct-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  46. 17-Oct-2022

    Issues

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  47. 28-Sep-2022

    Hearing on Nfl Appln.

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  48. 17-Sep-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  49. 26-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  50. 19-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  51. 29-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Notice

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  52. 11-Mar-2022

    Notice Ready

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  53. 11-Feb-2022

    Steps

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  54. 11-Jan-2022

    Written Statement

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  55. 09-Dec-2021

    Reply/Say

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  56. 28-Oct-2021

    Notice_Unready

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  57. 22-Sep-2021

    Notice_Unready

    M.A.C.T. Court No.4

  58. 15-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 04-May-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 395/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur awarded Rs. 9,80,100 in compensation to two married daughters for their mother's death in a motor vehicle accident, holding that the accident resulted from composite negligence of both the truck driver (who illegally parked) and car driver (who collided). The tribunal established that as surviving legal heirs, the daughters were entitled to claim compensation despite being married and residing separately, rejecting the insurance companies' dependency argument and applying recent Supreme Court precedent on liberal interpretation of the Motor Vehicles Act's beneficent provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case