Sachin Sampatrao Waghmare vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P. — 708/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 24th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHNG010035242026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
1580/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
708/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 12-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
Khaperkheda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sachin Sampatrao Waghmare
Adv. GAJBHIYE SUSHMA PRASHANT
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Additional Sessions Court at Nagpur granted bail to Sachin Sampatrao Waghmare in a knife assault case, finding that while he was present during the incident, he did not directly wield the weapon and had already spent 1.5 months in custody. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bond with surety, weekly reporting to investigating officers, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
20-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 708/2026
The Additional Sessions Court at Nagpur granted bail to Sachin Sampatrao Waghmare in a knife assault case, finding that while he was present during the incident, he did not directly wield the weapon and had already spent 1.5 months in custody. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 50,000 bond with surety, weekly reporting to investigating officers, and restrictions on tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts