Prerna Shubham Mahalle vs State of Maharashtra — 117/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 20th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG010034252026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
1539/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
117/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
301
Police Station
Ganeshpeth
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prerna Shubham Mahalle
Adv. MIR RIZWAN ALI JAFAR ALI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Special Court (NDPS) in Nagpur allowed the application of Prerna Shubham Mahalle to release her seized Mahindra vehicle (Registration No. MH-45-AV-4554) on interim custody. The court found that as the registered owner with no involvement in the crime, and considering the vehicle had been in police custody for over six months causing deterioration, release was warranted under the principle that seized property should not be retained longer than necessary. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 15,00,000 indemnity bond with conditions that it cannot be transferred or sold without court permission and must be produced when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 117/2026
The Special Court (NDPS) in Nagpur allowed the application of Prerna Shubham Mahalle to release her seized Mahindra vehicle (Registration No. MH-45-AV-4554) on interim custody. The court found that as the registered owner with no involvement in the crime, and considering the vehicle had been in police custody for over six months causing deterioration, release was warranted under the principle that seized property should not be retained longer than necessary. The vehicle was released on a Rs. 15,00,000 indemnity bond with conditions that it cannot be transferred or sold without court permission and must be produced when required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts