Sagar Ramesh Chaudhari vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P. — 661/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHNG010032432026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
1475/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
661/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
Kalamna
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sagar Ramesh Chaudhari
Adv. FULE KAUSTUBH UTTAMRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur granted bail to accused Sagar S/o Ramesh Chaudhari in an Arms Act case (Crime No. 267 of 2026), finding that one month's custody was sufficient and the investigation was complete. The court imposed bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, weekly reporting to police, and appearance at all proceedings, while rejecting prosecution objections based on criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 661/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur granted bail to accused Sagar S/o Ramesh Chaudhari in an Arms Act case (Crime No. 267 of 2026), finding that one month's custody was sufficient and the investigation was complete. The court imposed bail of Rs. 50,000 with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, weekly reporting to police, and appearance at all proceedings, while rejecting prosecution objections based on criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts