Satyam Jay Prakash Shukla vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P. — 638/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHNG010031722026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
1445/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
638/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
267
Police Station
Kalamna
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Satyam Jay Prakash Shukla
Adv. LAROKAR TILAK WADGUJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Satyam Jay Prakash Shukla in an Arms Act case, finding insufficient prima facie evidence of his involvement despite criminal antecedents. The court ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety in the like amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, weekly reporting to the investigating officer, and continued court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
07-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
06-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 638/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Satyam Jay Prakash Shukla in an Arms Act case, finding insufficient prima facie evidence of his involvement despite criminal antecedents. The court ordered his release on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety in the like amount, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, weekly reporting to the investigating officer, and continued court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts