MOHD NIYAZ MOHD SHAMSUL ANSARI vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P. — 608/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHNG010030322026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
1380/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
608/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
102
Police Station
Wathoda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHD NIYAZ MOHD SHAMSUL ANSARI
Adv. OPAI MOHD NAVEED MOHD PARVEZ
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Special Court NDPS Act, Nagpur granted bail to Mohd. Niyaz in a drug possession case, finding that nothing was seized from the applicant, the seized contraband (10 gms Mephedrone) was below commercial quantity exempting it from Section 37 NDPS Act rigors, and prolonged custody was unjustifiable. The court imposed conditions including a Rs.50,000 bond with surety, prohibition on tampering with evidence, weekly reporting to investigating officer, and mandatory court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
04-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 608/2026
Summary: The Special Court NDPS Act, Nagpur granted bail to Mohd. Niyaz in a drug possession case, finding that nothing was seized from the applicant, the seized contraband (10 gms Mephedrone) was below commercial quantity exempting it from Section 37 NDPS Act rigors, and prolonged custody was unjustifiable. The court imposed conditions including a Rs.50,000 bond with surety, prohibition on tampering with evidence, weekly reporting to investigating officer, and mandatory court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts