ABDUL SATTAR HAJI ISMAIL Through its Legal representative AMIR AYYUB NAGANI vs THE NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER — 65/2026

Case under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Section 81F. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHNG010027452026

e-Filing Number

22-02-2026

Filing Number

1508/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Section 81F
Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL SATTAR HAJI ISMAIL Through its Legal representative AMIR AYYUB NAGANI

    Adv. WASNIK RAJSHREE MANOHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER ESTATE

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER WARD OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The District Court of Nagpur dismissed the appeal of a businessman challenging the Nagpur Municipal Corporation's eviction notice for his shop premises. The court upheld the NMC's authority to reclaim the land for reconstructing the Lakadganj Fire Station, finding that the Corporation legitimately required the premises for public interest and followed due process of law. The court rejected the appellant's contentions that his shop fell outside the required construction area and that he was denied proper hearing, holding that the land reservation was validly declared and unchallenged by the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  12. 07-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  13. 05-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  15. 04-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  16. 27-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  17. 26-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  18. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District Court of Nagpur dismissed the appeal of a businessman challenging the Nagpur Municipal Corporation's eviction notice for his shop premises. The court upheld the NMC's authority to reclaim the land for reconstructing the Lakadganj Fire Station, finding that the Corporation legitimately required the premises for public interest and followed due process of law. The court rejected the appellant's contentions that his shop fell outside the required construction area and that he was denied proper hearing, holding that the land reservation was validly declared and unchallenged by the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case