Darshan Jamnulal Chawla vs Chandarbhan Narsomal Wadhwani — 70/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG010021332026

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

979/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

1-Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Darshan Jamnulal Chawla

    Adv. RATHOD MAHESH SHIVLAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandarbhan Narsomal Wadhwani

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Sessions Judge allowed the accused's application to consolidate three separate cheque dishonor cases (under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) pending in different courts into one court for unified adjudication, citing Section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Code and general convenience. The court directed priority handling of the consolidated cases as the complainant is a senior citizen and ordered all three cases to be administratively tagged to prevent further fragmentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge allowed the accused's application to consolidate three separate cheque dishonor cases (under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) pending in different courts into one court for unified adjudication, citing Section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Code and general convenience. The court directed priority handling of the consolidated cases as the complainant is a senior citizen and ordered all three cases to be administratively tagged to prevent further fragmentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case