Vinay Purushottam Bhange vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P. — 398/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHNG010019262026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
883/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
398/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
61
Police Station
Rana Pratap Nagar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinay Purushottam Bhange
Adv. SONWANE SAMEER PURUSHOTTAM
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - A.P.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Disposed
Order
Order
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge in Nagpur granted anticipatory bail to Vinay S/o Purushottam Bhange in a property dispute case, finding that the criminal charges arose from a civil land ownership dispute rather than genuine criminal conduct. The court determined that prima facie involvement was lacking, the accused had no criminal antecedents, and no custodial interrogation was necessary, subject to conditions including weekly reporting to the investigating officer until charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge in Nagpur granted anticipatory bail to Vinay S/o Purushottam Bhange in a property dispute case, finding that the criminal charges arose from a civil land ownership dispute rather than genuine criminal conduct. The court determined that prima facie involvement was lacking, the accused had no criminal antecedents, and no custodial interrogation was necessary, subject to conditions including weekly reporting to the investigating officer until charge-sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts