State of Maharashtra vs Tushar Pawan Agrawal — 90/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHNG010015932026

Reply/Say

Next Hearing

12th May 2026

e-Filing Number

30-01-2026

Filing Number

743/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

FIR Details

FIR Number

972

Police Station

Lakadganj

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123
NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT Section 8(c), 22(b)
DRUGS AND COSMETICS ACT Section 18(A),18(B),18(C),27(B)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Tushar Pawan Agrawal

Bharatkumar Dipakkumar Amarnani

Adv. null

Shivedra urf Shibbu Shrinath Verma

Adv. null

Amir Sheikh Mehamud / Mahemud

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

05-05-2026

Reply/Say

02-05-2026

Order

27-04-2026

Hearing

18-04-2026

Hearing

15-04-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

05-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Special Court NDPS Act, Nagpur rejected the application filed by Deepak Ghanshyamdas Amarnani seeking interim custody release of two mobile handsets (Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Apple iPhone 15 Plus) seized during investigation of an NDPS Act offense. The court found that since the mobiles constitute crucial evidence containing electronic records relevant to the ongoing prosecution, they cannot be released to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Special Court NDPS Act, Nagpur rejected the application filed by Deepak Ghanshyamdas Amarnani seeking interim custody release of two mobile handsets (Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra and Apple iPhone 15 Plus) seized during investigation of an NDPS Act offense. The court found that since the mobiles constitute crucial evidence containing electronic records relevant to the ongoing prosecution, they cannot be released to the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case