State of Maharashtra vs Taj Mohammad Habib Sheikh — 42/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)(C),29. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Spl.Case

CNR: MHNG010007342026

Hearing

Next Hearing

12th May 2026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

366/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

FIR Details

FIR Number

380

Police Station

Pardi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)(C),29

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Taj Mohammad Habib Sheikh

Shailendra Ramlakhan Gupta

Adv. null

Mohasin Abdul Sattar Khan

Adv. null

Wajad Hasan Ali Sheikh

Adv. null

Chhotu @ Shritam @ Kalu Pradip Danga (Absconding)

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

07-05-2026

Hearing

02-05-2026

Reply/Say

28-04-2026

Production of Accused

15-04-2026

Production of Accused

10-04-2026

Order

Interim Orders

15-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY: Mohsin Khan's bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in an NDPS Act case was rejected. The Special Court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in a ganja trafficking conspiracy (106.85 kg seized), including frequent phone calls with co-accused and providing ₹5,00,000 for the purchase, making the Tofan Singh judgment inapplicable. The commercial quantity attracted the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, denying bail eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: Mohsin Khan's bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in an NDPS Act case was rejected. The Special Court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in a ganja trafficking conspiracy (106.85 kg seized), including frequent phone calls with co-accused and providing ₹5,00,000 for the purchase, making the Tofan Singh judgment inapplicable. The commercial quantity attracted the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, denying bail eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case