State of Maharashtra vs Taj Mohammad Habib Sheikh — 42/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)(C),29. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 12th May 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 12-May-2026 this date has passed

Spl.Case

CNR: MHNG010007342026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

366/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

380

Police Station

Pardi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8(c),20(b)(ii)(C),29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Taj Mohammad Habib Sheikh

  2. 2.Shailendra Ramlakhan Gupta

    Adv. null

  3. 3.Mohasin Abdul Sattar Khan

    Adv. null

  4. 4.Wajad Hasan Ali Sheikh

    Adv. null

  5. 5.Chhotu @ Shritam @ Kalu Pradip Danga (Absconding)

    Adv. null

Case History

  1. 12-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  3. 02-May-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Production of Accused

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY: Mohsin Khan's bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in an NDPS Act case was rejected. The Special Court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in a ganja trafficking conspiracy (106.85 kg seized), including frequent phone calls with co-accused and providing ₹5,00,000 for the purchase, making the Tofan Singh judgment inapplicable. The commercial quantity attracted the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, denying bail eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Production of Accused

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  8. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  9. 06-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  10. 02-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  11. 01-Apr-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  12. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 23-Mar-2026

    Production of Accused

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  14. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  15. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  16. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  17. 04-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  18. 26-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  19. 21-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  20. 17-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  21. 12-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  22. 09-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  23. 04-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  24. 02-Feb-2026

    Production of Accused

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  25. 19-Jan-2026

    Production of Accused

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  26. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: Mohsin Khan's bail application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in an NDPS Act case was rejected. The Special Court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in a ganja trafficking conspiracy (106.85 kg seized), including frequent phone calls with co-accused and providing ₹5,00,000 for the purchase, making the Tofan Singh judgment inapplicable. The commercial quantity attracted the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, denying bail eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case