Mirabai Sudhakar Thete vs Keshavrao Ganpatrao Mungal Advocate - Maldode S. R. — 58/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 10. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHND270002072023
Filing Number
85/2023
Filing Date
17-Mar-2023
Registration No
58/2023
Registration Date
17-Mar-2023
Court
Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Mudkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mirabai Sudhakar Thete
Adv. DEVTHANKAR V.V.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Keshavrao Ganpatrao Mungal Advocate - Maldode S. R.
-
2.Aanyabai Keshvrao Mungal
-
3.Rajesh KeshavraoMungal
-
4.Santosh Rajesh Mungal
-
5.Ijubai Baburao Adkine
-
6.Kantabai Baburao Deshmukh
-
7.Yogesh Mukundrao Mungal
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Apr-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
15-Apr-2026
Bringing L.R.s
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Bringing L.R.s
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
22-Apr-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
26-Mar-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
05-Mar-2025
Dismissal Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
07-Jan-2025
Dismissal Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
22-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
13-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
10-Jul-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: RJE No. 58/2023 Outcome: The court set aside a "no say" order dated 06-12-2023 and directed the respondents to file their response. The Civil Judge accepted their explanation that agricultural work, educational commitments in Pune, and elderly care responsibilities prevented timely advocate contact, finding the delay unintentional and warranting fair opportunity to present their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Apr-2024
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
13-Mar-2024
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
14-Feb-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Jan-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
06-Dec-2023
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
17-Oct-2023
No Say Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
12-Sep-2023
No Say Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-Aug-2023
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
19-Jul-2023
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
21-Jun-2023
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
25-Apr-2023
Ex-Parte Order
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2023
Case Summary: RJE No. 58/2023 Outcome: The court set aside a "no say" order dated 06-12-2023 and directed the respondents to file their response. The Civil Judge accepted their explanation that agricultural work, educational commitments in Pune, and elderly care responsibilities prevented timely advocate contact, finding the delay unintentional and warranting fair opportunity to present their case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts