Sandesh Tukaram Jadhav vs Mayadevi Vithalrao Kable — 66/2020

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHND260008872020

Filing Number

243/2020

Filing Date

17-Dec-2020

Registration No

66/2020

Registration Date

17-Dec-2020

Court

Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Ardhapur

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sandesh Tukaram Jadhav

    Adv. Kokare M.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mayadevi Vithalrao Kable

  2. 2.Alkabai Ashok Bothe

  3. 3.Amol Ashok Bothe

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  10. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  11. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  12. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  13. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  14. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  15. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  16. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  17. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  18. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  19. 18-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  20. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  21. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  22. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  23. 28-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  24. 02-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  25. 23-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  26. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  27. 16-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  28. 02-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  29. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  30. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  31. 22-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  32. 06-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  33. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  34. 02-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  35. 10-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  36. 03-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  37. 20-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  38. 06-Oct-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  39. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  40. 25-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  41. 17-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  42. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  43. 18-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  44. 07-Jul-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  45. 16-Jun-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  46. 29-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  47. 17-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  48. 12-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  49. 03-Apr-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  50. 14-Mar-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  51. 03-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  52. 23-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  53. 31-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  54. 16-Jan-2023

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  55. 19-Dec-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  56. 25-Nov-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  57. 17-Nov-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  58. 13-Oct-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  59. 21-Sep-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  60. 16-Aug-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  61. 22-Jul-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  62. 29-Jun-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  63. 16-Jun-2022

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  64. 16-Jun-2022

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 66/2020 Outcome: The court rejected the defendants' (Mayadevi Vithalrao Kable, Alkabai Ashok Bothe, and Amol Ashok Bothe) application for temporary injunction under CPC Order XXXIX, Rules 1-2. The defendants claimed ownership of 0.40 acres of agricultural land at Yelegaon, Nanded, based on an agreement to sell dated 09.04.2018 with the late Tukaram Dhonduji Jadhav (plaintiff's father), who accepted ₹1,00,000 and allegedly gave possession. The court found the defendants failed to establish a prima facie case, as they provided no 7/12 revenue extracts or crop entries proving their possession. The plaintiff, being an heir with documented heirship certificate and 7/12 entries, presented stronger evidence of rightful possession. The court determined the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss without injunction protection, while defendants could pursue monetary recovery or specific performance suits separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  65. 16-Jun-2022

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  66. 06-May-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  67. 02-May-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  68. 27-Apr-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  69. 13-Apr-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  70. 05-Apr-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  71. 24-Mar-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  72. 17-Mar-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  73. 28-Feb-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  74. 15-Feb-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  75. 27-Jan-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  76. 12-Jan-2022

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  77. 23-Dec-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  78. 20-Dec-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  79. 07-Dec-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  80. 23-Nov-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  81. 11-Nov-2021

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  82. 26-Oct-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  83. 12-Oct-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  84. 30-Sep-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  85. 23-Sep-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  86. 15-Sep-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  87. 04-Sep-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  88. 31-Aug-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  89. 13-Aug-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  90. 29-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  91. 23-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  92. 07-Jul-2021

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  93. 14-Jun-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  94. 20-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  95. 26-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  96. 10-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  97. 16-Feb-2021

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  98. 04-Feb-2021

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  99. 30-Jan-2021

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  100. 12-Jan-2021

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge Jd JMFC Ardhapur

  101. 22-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  102. 17-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 66/2020 Outcome: The court rejected the defendants' (Mayadevi Vithalrao Kable, Alkabai Ashok Bothe, and Amol Ashok Bothe) application for temporary injunction under CPC Order XXXIX, Rules 1-2. The defendants claimed ownership of 0.40 acres of agricultural land at Yelegaon, Nanded, based on an agreement to sell dated 09.04.2018 with the late Tukaram Dhonduji Jadhav (plaintiff's father), who accepted ₹1,00,000 and allegedly gave possession. The court found the defendants failed to establish a prima facie case, as they provided no 7/12 revenue extracts or crop entries proving their possession. The plaintiff, being an heir with documented heirship certificate and 7/12 entries, presented stronger evidence of rightful possession. The court determined the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss without injunction protection, while defendants could pursue monetary recovery or specific performance suits separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case