State of Maharashtra vs Chapat Dattram Hambarde Advocate - Sk. Abdul Kalam — 82/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341, 506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHND250002202024
Filing Number
172/2024
Filing Date
26-Feb-2024
Registration No
82/2024
Registration Date
26-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Umri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chapat Dattram Hambarde Advocate - Sk. Abdul Kalam
-
2.Dattram Shankar Hambarde
Adv. Sk. Abdul Kalam
-
3.Ansaji Shankr Hambarde
Adv. Sk. Abdul Kalam
-
4.Maroti Ansaji Hambarde
Adv. Sk. Abdul Kalam
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 82/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Champat Dattaram Hambarde, Dattaram Shankara Hambarde, Ansaji Shankar Hambarde, and Maroti Ansaji Hambarde) under IPC Sections 341, 506 with Section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (complainant/witness No. 1) provided vague testimony, merely stating there was a "disturbance" on the date in question without substantiating the specific allegations of criminal intimidation or threatening gestures. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had deliberately obstructed the complainant or made threatening statements, as required under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
19-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
30-Jul-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
29-Jul-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
03-Jul-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
04-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2024
Summary of Case 82/2024 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Champat Dattaram Hambarde, Dattaram Shankara Hambarde, Ansaji Shankar Hambarde, and Maroti Ansaji Hambarde) under IPC Sections 341, 506 with Section 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges. Key Reasoning: The sole prosecution witness (complainant/witness No. 1) provided vague testimony, merely stating there was a "disturbance" on the date in question without substantiating the specific allegations of criminal intimidation or threatening gestures. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had deliberately obstructed the complainant or made threatening statements, as required under criminal law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts