State of Maharashtra vs Dattaram Shankar Hambarde Advocate - Sk. Abdul Kalam — 36/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,143,147,148,149,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHND250002152022
e-Filing Number
30-04-2022
Filing Number
137/2022
Filing Date
30-Apr-2022
Registration No
36/2022
Registration Date
30-Apr-2022
Court
Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Umri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
260
Police Station
Umri
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dattaram Shankar Hambarde Advocate - Sk. Abdul Kalam
-
2.Ansaji Shankar Hambarde
-
3.Sudhakar Shankar Hambarde
-
4.Madhukar Shankar Hambarde
-
5.Rajesh Dattaram Hambarde
-
6.Maroti Hansaji Hambarde
-
7.Kishan Shankar Hambarde
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court acquitted all seven accused persons (Dattaram Shankar Hambarde and six others) of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, and 149, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and causing hurt during an alleged incident on December 5, 2021. The judge noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and absence of direct corroborating evidence, particularly regarding the specific roles of individual accused members in the alleged altercation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
27-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
02-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
17-Dec-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
30-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
23-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
24-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
27-Jun-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
27-May-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-Apr-2024
Charge
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-Feb-2024
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
07-Dec-2023
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
10-Oct-2023
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
21-Jul-2023
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
16-May-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
22-Feb-2023
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
17-Dec-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
22-Nov-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC
-
18-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2022
The court acquitted all seven accused persons (Dattaram Shankar Hambarde and six others) of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 143, 147, and 149, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations of unlawful assembly, criminal intimidation, and causing hurt during an alleged incident on December 5, 2021. The judge noted inconsistencies in witness testimonies and absence of direct corroborating evidence, particularly regarding the specific roles of individual accused members in the alleged altercation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts