Sangita Vinayak Kalyan vs Sulochanbai Rohidas Kalyan Advocate - Ingole S.B. — 220/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section sec38. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHND240012492025
e-Filing Number
03-10-2025
Filing Number
377/2025
Filing Date
03-Oct-2025
Registration No
220/2025
Registration Date
04-Oct-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Naigaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sangita Vinayak Kalyan
Adv. Wadje S.T.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sulochanbai Rohidas Kalyan Advocate - Ingole S.B.
-
2.Rohidas Vitthal Kalyan
-
3.Suryakant Rohidas Kalyan
-
4.Pratibha w/o Avinash Kadam
-
5.Sangeeta w/o Govindrao Bendrikar
-
6.Premala Pandharinath Jadhav
-
7.Vitthal Suryakant Kalyan
-
8.Dyaneshwar Suryakant Kalyan
-
9.Nilkhant Kesharao Bomnale
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Steps
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
17-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 220/2025 - Sangita Vs. Sulochanbai & Ors. The court granted the plaintiff's Status Quo application, ordering both parties to maintain the status quo till the next hearing date. The plaintiff claimed she had a share in properties purchased from joint family income, while the defendants (registered owners) failed to file written statements. The court found prima facie that alienating the properties would cause irreparable harm to the plaintiff and that maintaining status quo would not prejudice the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Steps
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
04-Apr-2026
Steps
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
18-Mar-2026
Steps
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
07-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
20-Dec-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
26-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
06-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 220/2025
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 220/2025 - Sangita Vs. Sulochanbai & Ors. The court granted the plaintiff's Status Quo application, ordering both parties to maintain the status quo till the next hearing date. The plaintiff claimed she had a share in properties purchased from joint family income, while the defendants (registered owners) failed to file written statements. The court found prima facie that alienating the properties would cause irreparable harm to the plaintiff and that maintaining status quo would not prejudice the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts