Ashraf Shakil Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.Ramtirth Advocate - A.P.P. — 43/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th April 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHND240003352026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
226/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
43/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Naigaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
Ramtirth
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashraf Shakil Shaikh
Adv. Mujahid Sayyad
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through P.S.Ramtirth Advocate - A.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted Ashraf Shakil Shaikh temporary custody of a seized Mahindra XUV 500 vehicle after verifying he purchased it from the original owner on 10/12/2025. The court ordered release upon executing a ₹3,00,000 bond, with conditions that he produce the vehicle when directed, not alienate or modify it, and not use it for any offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
04-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
01-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
31-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
27-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
24-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
18-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2026
The court granted Ashraf Shakil Shaikh temporary custody of a seized Mahindra XUV 500 vehicle after verifying he purchased it from the original owner on 10/12/2025. The court ordered release upon executing a ₹3,00,000 bond, with conditions that he produce the vehicle when directed, not alienate or modify it, and not use it for any offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts