State of Maharashtra Through P.S.Kuntur vs Abbas Rashul Shaikh — 14/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 18th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHND240000592026
e-Filing Number
02-01-2026
Filing Number
33/2026
Filing Date
09-Jan-2026
Registration No
14/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Naigaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
282
Police Station
Kuntoor
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through P.S.Kuntur
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Abbas Rashul Shaikh
-
2.Shivaji Kalaba More
-
3.Balaji Laxman Chinchalwad
-
4.Prakash Shankar Jondhale
-
5.Madhav Bajirao Kumnale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court convicted all five accused persons under Section 12-A of the Maharashtra Gambling Prevention Act for accepting bets on the card game Andar Bahar in a public place on 08/12/2025. All accused pleaded guilty and were sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 each with six days simple imprisonment in default, with the court showing leniency considering their age, first-time offence, and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd JMFC Naigaon Bz.
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 14/2026
The court convicted all five accused persons under Section 12-A of the Maharashtra Gambling Prevention Act for accepting bets on the card game Andar Bahar in a public place on 08/12/2025. All accused pleaded guilty and were sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 each with six days simple imprisonment in default, with the court showing leniency considering their age, first-time offence, and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts