Sachin s /o Pandhari Bansode vs Pandhari s/o Gendaji Bansode — 119/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 18th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHND230004062026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
216/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
119/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge JD and JMFC , Mukhed
Judge
5-
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sachin s /o Pandhari Bansode
Adv. Aspatwad H.M.
-
2.Amol s/o Pandhari Bansode
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pandhari s/o Gendaji Bansode
-
2.Sangita w/o Pandhari Bansode
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 119/2026 Summary The court disposed of the suit between Sachin Bansode (plaintiff) and Pandhari Bansode & Sangita (defendants) by accepting a compromise settlement reached between the parties outside court. The court verified the parties' agreement, recorded the compromise deed (Exhibit 11), and passed a decree incorporating the settlement terms under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, with court fees to be refunded if claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Compromise
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2026
Case 119/2026 Summary The court disposed of the suit between Sachin Bansode (plaintiff) and Pandhari Bansode & Sangita (defendants) by accepting a compromise settlement reached between the parties outside court. The court verified the parties' agreement, recorded the compromise deed (Exhibit 11), and passed a decree incorporating the settlement terms under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, with court fees to be refunded if claimed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts