Vyankat Namdev Suryavanshi vs Gangadhar Namdev Suryavanshi — 107/2026

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHND230003762026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

197/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge JD and JMFC , Mukhed

Judge

5-

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vyankat Namdev Suryavanshi

    Adv. JADHAV RAMKRUSHN DHONDIBA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gangadhar Namdev Suryavanshi

  2. 2.Ashok Namdev Suryavanshi

  3. 3.Babu Namdev Suryavanshi

  4. 4.Bharat Namdev Suryavanshi

  5. 5.Kerabai Waman Patil

  6. 6.Shantabai Keraba Biradar

  7. 7.Ranjana Ramesh Suryavanshi

  8. 8.Rohan Ramesh Suryawanshi UG Def 7

  9. 9.Pawan Ramesh Suryavanshi UG def no 7

  10. 10.Savita Bharat Suryawanshi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court disposed of the suit through compromise settlement between Vyankat Namdev Suryavanshi and the respondents (Gangadhar, Ashok, and Babu Namdev Suryavanshi) under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC. The court verified the parties' mutual agreement to the compromise terms and incorporated them into the decree, while ordering refund of court fees to the plaintiff if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Compromise

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the suit through compromise settlement between Vyankat Namdev Suryavanshi and the respondents (Gangadhar, Ashok, and Babu Namdev Suryavanshi) under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC. The court verified the parties' mutual agreement to the compromise terms and incorporated them into the decree, while ordering refund of court fees to the plaintiff if requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case