Shivaji s/o Maroti Ibitdar vs Nil — 80/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHND230003252026

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

80/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge JD and JMFC , Mukhed

Judge

1-Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC Mukhed

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivaji s/o Maroti Ibitdar

    Adv. Gawalwad M. C.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 80/2026 The court granted Shivaji's application for a heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, confirming him as the legal heir of his deceased father Maroti Ibitadar (died 15.06.1982). The court found the applicant's claims supported by death certificate, Aadhar identity, oral testimony, and affidavit, with no objections raised after public notice publication in newspapers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC Mukhed

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Order

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC Mukhed

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Order

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC Mukhed

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Proclomation

    Jt.civil Judge J.D. And JMFC Mukhed

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 80/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 80/2026 The court granted Shivaji's application for a heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, confirming him as the legal heir of his deceased father Maroti Ibitadar (died 15.06.1982). The court found the applicant's claims supported by death certificate, Aadhar identity, oral testimony, and affidavit, with no objections raised after public notice publication in newspapers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case