Kamlabai @ Taramati W/o Chaturbhuj Bukke vs Balaji S/o Aapparao Patil Advocate - Sontakke U. B. — 63/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHND230002452022

Filing Number

107/2022

Filing Date

16-Feb-2022

Registration No

63/2022

Registration Date

16-Feb-2022

Court

Civil Judge JD and JMFC , Mukhed

Judge

5-2nd Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Mukhed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kamlabai @ Taramati W/o Chaturbhuj Bukke

    Adv. Mohate D.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balaji S/o Aapparao Patil Advocate - Sontakke U. B.

  2. 2.Parmeshwar S/o Balaji Patil

  3. 3.Sarswati @ Sagar D/o Balaji Patil

  4. 4.Dattatray S/o Balaji Patil

  5. 5.Anusaya W/o Somnath Kahalekar

  6. 6.Savita W/o Mahaling Bharde

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Evidence

  3. 05-May-2026

    Evidence

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

  9. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

  10. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

  11. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

  12. 27-Mar-2025

    Evidence

  13. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

  14. 14-Jan-2025

    Evidence

  15. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

  16. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

  17. 10-Sep-2024

    Evidence

  18. 31-Jul-2024

    List of Witness

  19. 03-Jul-2024

    Issues

  20. 06-May-2024

    Issues

  21. 28-Mar-2024

    Issues

  22. 14-Mar-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 63/2022 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction filed on 14.03.2024. Key Facts: Kamlabai sought to restrain defendants (her deceased sister's husband and children) from alienating agricultural land (Gat No. 271) in Nanded district pending partition suit disposal. She claimed a birth right in the ancestral property, alleging defendants obtained fraudulent ownership through a prior partition decree (R.C.S. No. 134/2017) while excluding her. Court's Reasoning: The judge found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Crucially, revenue records showed plaintiff had voluntarily executed a written consent deed (Rs. 20 stamp) relinquishing her rights favoring her deceased sister in 2001, forming the basis for defendants' title. The court noted the plaintiff provided no credible evidence contradicting this consent or alleging forgery, and vaguely pleaded about threatened alienation without identifying any actual third-party transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 14-Mar-2024

    Issues

  24. 27-Feb-2024

    Citation

  25. 15-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  26. 01-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  27. 20-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  28. 15-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  29. 03-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  30. 04-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  31. 06-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  32. 02-Aug-2023

    Appearance

  33. 15-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Summons

  34. 27-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Summons

  35. 24-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

  36. 16-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Summons

  37. 22-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Summons

  38. 23-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Summons

  39. 21-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Summons

  40. 03-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

  41. 14-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Summons

  42. 22-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Summons

  43. 16-Feb-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 16-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 63/2022 Outcome: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction filed on 14.03.2024. Key Facts: Kamlabai sought to restrain defendants (her deceased sister's husband and children) from alienating agricultural land (Gat No. 271) in Nanded district pending partition suit disposal. She claimed a birth right in the ancestral property, alleging defendants obtained fraudulent ownership through a prior partition decree (R.C.S. No. 134/2017) while excluding her. Court's Reasoning: The judge found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Crucially, revenue records showed plaintiff had voluntarily executed a written consent deed (Rs. 20 stamp) relinquishing her rights favoring her deceased sister in 2001, forming the basis for defendants' title. The court noted the plaintiff provided no credible evidence contradicting this consent or alleging forgery, and vaguely pleaded about threatened alienation without identifying any actual third-party transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case