KRUSHANA DIGAMBAR MURKHE vs INVESTIGATION OFFICER POLICE STATION MAHUR Advocate - A.P.P. — 17/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th March 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHND200002622026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2026
Filing Number
203/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Mahur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Mahur Dist. Nanded
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 12-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
52
Police Station
Sindkhed
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRUSHANA DIGAMBAR MURKHE
Adv. BHAWARE VISHAL UTTAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.INVESTIGATION OFFICER POLICE STATION MAHUR Advocate - A.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court approved Krishna Murkhey's petition under CrPC Section 503 for temporary custody of his seized tractor (MH-26-CE-5097). The court held that since the applicant is the registered owner and the vehicle has no connection to the crime (FIR 53/2026), retaining it in police custody would cause deterioration and loss. The tractor was granted to the applicant on a temporary basis upon submission of a five-lakh rupee indemnity bond, with conditions including non-modification of the vehicle and submission of photographs to the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Mahur Dist. Nanded
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Mahur Dist. Nanded
-
23-Mar-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Mahur Dist. Nanded
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2026
Summary The court approved Krishna Murkhey's petition under CrPC Section 503 for temporary custody of his seized tractor (MH-26-CE-5097). The court held that since the applicant is the registered owner and the vehicle has no connection to the crime (FIR 53/2026), retaining it in police custody would cause deterioration and loss. The tractor was granted to the applicant on a temporary basis upon submission of a five-lakh rupee indemnity bond, with conditions including non-modification of the vehicle and submission of photographs to the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts