Namdev S/o Maroti Tarke vs Vijay Shankarrao Tarke Advocate - Jadhav S.G. — 191/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Nil. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 17-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHND190010802023

Filing Number

350/2023

Filing Date

04-Aug-2023

Registration No

191/2023

Registration Date

04-Aug-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Loha

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Nil

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Namdev S/o Maroti Tarke

    Adv. Dange G.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Shankarrao Tarke Advocate - Jadhav S.G.

  2. 2.Kalba S/o Shankarrao Tarke

  3. 3.Digambar S/o Shankarrao Tarke

  4. 4.Keshav S/o Shankarrao Tarke

  5. 5.Dayanade s/o Shankarrao Tarke

  6. 6.Sangitabai w/o Babarao Tarke

  7. 7.Daneshwar s/o Govindrao Tarke

  8. 8.Digambar s/o Dadarao Tarke

  9. 9.Bapurao S/o Arjuna Tarke

Case History

  1. 17-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

  5. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    List of Witness

    CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

  7. 24-Sep-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

  8. 01-Aug-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

  9. 23-Jun-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D JMFC. Loha

  10. 17-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr. Division and JMFC, Loha

  11. 12-Mar-2025

    Issues

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  12. 10-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Civil Suit 191/2023 Outcome: Plaintiff Namdev Tarke's application for temporary injunction against defendants 4-9 was rejected on 10.02.2025. Key Facts: Namdev sought to restrain defendants from disturbing his peaceful possession of agricultural land (1H 45R) in Gut No. 55, village Kivla, Nanded district, which he claims to own through partition (1997) and subsequent purchase (1999). He also filed a recovery suit against defendants 1-3 for alleged encroachment of 16R. Reason for Rejection: The court found plaintiff failed to establish the three essential conditions for temporary injunction: (1) no prima facie case proven—no documentary evidence showed defendants actually encroached; (2) balance of convenience not in plaintiff's favor; (3) no irreparable loss if injunction denied. The court noted the encroachment claim is a matter requiring evidence at trial, not at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 10-Feb-2025

    Issues

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  14. 31-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  15. 21-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  16. 07-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  17. 17-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  18. 19-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  19. 24-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  20. 20-Sep-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  21. 22-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  22. 22-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  23. 29-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  24. 07-May-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  25. 27-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  26. 01-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  27. 02-Feb-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  28. 19-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  29. 24-Nov-2023

    W.S. and Say

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  30. 25-Oct-2023

    W.S. and Say

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  31. 11-Sep-2023

    W.S. and Say

    IInd Joint Civil Judge J.D. and Judicial Magistrate F.C. Loha

  32. 08-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 04-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 191/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil Suit 191/2023 Outcome: Plaintiff Namdev Tarke's application for temporary injunction against defendants 4-9 was rejected on 10.02.2025. Key Facts: Namdev sought to restrain defendants from disturbing his peaceful possession of agricultural land (1H 45R) in Gut No. 55, village Kivla, Nanded district, which he claims to own through partition (1997) and subsequent purchase (1999). He also filed a recovery suit against defendants 1-3 for alleged encroachment of 16R. Reason for Rejection: The court found plaintiff failed to establish the three essential conditions for temporary injunction: (1) no prima facie case proven—no documentary evidence showed defendants actually encroached; (2) balance of convenience not in plaintiff's favor; (3) no irreparable loss if injunction denied. The court noted the encroachment claim is a matter requiring evidence at trial, not at the interim stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case