Sajeda w/o Kaji Sayyad Karimoddin vs Sk.Maksood s/o Sk.Mahmood Advocate - Darade D.M. — 51/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHND180010972021
Filing Number
314/2021
Filing Date
28-Oct-2021
Registration No
51/2021
Registration Date
28-Oct-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Kinwat
Judge
25-CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sajeda w/o Kaji Sayyad Karimoddin
Adv. Syed K.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sk.Maksood s/o Sk.Mahmood Advocate - Darade D.M.
-
2.Sk.Manjur Ahmad s/o Sk.Mahmood
Adv. Tajne S.S.
-
3.Sk.Mushir s/o Sk.Mahmood
Adv. Tajne S.S.
-
4.Sadiya w/o Layeek Pathan
Adv. Tajne S.S.
-
5.Saleha w/o Sk.Liyakat
Adv. Tajne S.S.
-
6.Sadekha w/o Jakiulla Khan
Adv. Tajne S.S.
-
7.Nyajbi w/o Sk.Mahmood
Adv. Tajne S.S.
-
8.Jeetendra s/o Balkishan Tiwari
Adv. Shirpure S. P.,Sonkamble R.D. Kendre R.E.
-
9.Gyaneshwar s/o Tukaram Ankade
Adv. Shirpure S. P.,Sonkamble R.D. Kendre R.E.
-
10.Deelip s/o Parasram Kendre
Adv. Shirpure S. P.,Sonkamble R.D. Kendre R.E.
-
11.Aasha w/o Sunil Ghuge
Adv. Shirpure S. P.,Sonkamble R.D. Kendre R.E.
-
12.Radha w/o Suresh Ghuge
Adv. Shirpure S. P.,sonkamble r.d. Kendre R.E.
-
13.Sarika w/o Ravindra Kendre
Adv. Shirpure S. P.,Sonkamble R.D. Kendre R.E.
Case History
-
14-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
25-Mar-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
16-Oct-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
08-Aug-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
08-Jul-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S No. 51/2021 Outcome: Defendant No. 1's application to reject the plaint was rejected. The court found the suit was properly valued with requisite court fees paid, and the omission of certain properties does not warrant plaint rejection. Key Points: Plaintiff Sajeda Karimoddin sought partition and separate possession of property. Defendant No. 1 challenged the suit valuation, arguing that since it involved challenging a sale deed worth Rs. 26 lakhs, higher court fees should apply under the Bombay Court Fees Act. The court held that since the plaintiff was not a party to the sale deed and did not seek its avoidance as relief, she was governed by a different fee provision and properly valued the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
27-Jun-2024
Reply Unready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
24-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
13-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
07-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
18-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
28-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
02-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
19-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
20-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
30-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
03-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
05-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
08-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
19-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
29-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
09-Mar-2023
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
08-Feb-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
04-Jan-2023
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
08-Dec-2022
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
01-Nov-2022
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
21-Sep-2022
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
16-Aug-2022
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
18-Jul-2022
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
10-Jun-2022
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
12-Apr-2022
List of Witness
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
05-Mar-2022
List of Witness
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
11-Feb-2022
Issues
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
21-Jan-2022
Steps
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
20-Dec-2021
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J D And J.M.F.C. Kinwat
-
28-Oct-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 51/2021
Case Summary: R.C.S No. 51/2021 Outcome: Defendant No. 1's application to reject the plaint was rejected. The court found the suit was properly valued with requisite court fees paid, and the omission of certain properties does not warrant plaint rejection. Key Points: Plaintiff Sajeda Karimoddin sought partition and separate possession of property. Defendant No. 1 challenged the suit valuation, arguing that since it involved challenging a sale deed worth Rs. 26 lakhs, higher court fees should apply under the Bombay Court Fees Act. The court held that since the plaintiff was not a party to the sale deed and did not seek its avoidance as relief, she was governed by a different fee provision and properly valued the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts