Namdeo Satvaji Bhise vs Deorao Satvaji Bhise — 425/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39rule1and2ofcpc. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 18th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHND160012502024

e-Filing Number

13-08-2024

Filing Number

718/2024

Filing Date

13-Aug-2024

Registration No

425/2024

Registration Date

13-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Hadgaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39rule1and2ofcpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Namdeo Satvaji Bhise

    Adv. PAWAR RAJESH DHARMARAO

  2. 2.Tejashila Namdeo Bhise

    Adv. PAWAR RAJESH DHARMARAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deorao Satvaji Bhise

  2. 2.Gajanan Deorao Bhise

  3. 3.Krashna Deorao Bhise

  4. 4.Kishor Deorao Bhise

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  10. 25-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  13. 30-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  14. 08-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  16. 04-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  18. 30-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  19. 12-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  20. 30-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  21. 15-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  22. 07-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  23. 02-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  24. 25-Mar-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  25. 17-Mar-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  26. 10-Mar-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  27. 03-Mar-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  28. 17-Feb-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  29. 31-Jan-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  30. 09-Jan-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  31. 12-Dec-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  32. 04-Dec-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  33. 24-Oct-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 425/2024 Court Decision: The application for temporary injunction is partly allowed. The court granted restraining orders only for one of three disputed properties. Key Facts: Namdeo Bhise sought to restrain his brother Deorao and nephews from obstructing his possession of agricultural land. The dispute centers on whether the land was purchased individually by Namdeo (using his government salary) or jointly with Deorao during a period of joint family residence. Court's Reasoning: The court found that registered sale deeds carry presumptive legal value over agreements-to-sale and witness affidavits. For the primary property (Gat No. 120 in Jagapur), the registered deed in Namdeo's name supported his ownership. However, Namdeo failed to produce registered deeds for two other properties, relying only on mutation entries—insufficient to establish prima facie possession against the defendants' counterclaims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  34. 24-Oct-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  35. 21-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  36. 17-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  37. 11-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  38. 09-Oct-2024

    No W.S. Order

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  39. 07-Oct-2024

    No W.S. Order

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  40. 30-Sep-2024

    No W.S. Order

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  41. 23-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  42. 02-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Hadgaon

  43. 13-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 13-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 425/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 425/2024 Court Decision: The application for temporary injunction is partly allowed. The court granted restraining orders only for one of three disputed properties. Key Facts: Namdeo Bhise sought to restrain his brother Deorao and nephews from obstructing his possession of agricultural land. The dispute centers on whether the land was purchased individually by Namdeo (using his government salary) or jointly with Deorao during a period of joint family residence. Court's Reasoning: The court found that registered sale deeds carry presumptive legal value over agreements-to-sale and witness affidavits. For the primary property (Gat No. 120 in Jagapur), the registered deed in Namdeo's name supported his ownership. However, Namdeo failed to produce registered deeds for two other properties, relying only on mutation entries—insufficient to establish prima facie possession against the defendants' counterclaims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case