Rajanitai Sandeep Patil vs Prakash Khushalrao Jadhav Advocate - Deshmukh S. M. — 415/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHND140008702023
Filing Number
473/2023
Filing Date
15-Apr-2023
Registration No
415/2023
Registration Date
15-Apr-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Degloor
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajanitai Sandeep Patil
Adv. Bhalke L. B.
-
2.Deepti Shrikant Patil
-
3.Pushpabai Prakashrao Jadhav
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prakash Khushalrao Jadhav Advocate - Deshmukh S. M.
-
2.Pratibha Prakashrao Jadhav
-
3.Mayadevi Prakash Jadhav
-
4.Yogesh Prakash Jadhav
-
5.Shila Vithal More
-
6.Asha Sandeep Kadam
-
7.Aloukik Gangadhar Jadhav
-
8.Shrikant Vijaykumar Patil
-
9.Sonal Amit Pardeshi
-
10.Mandabai Shivaji Jadhav
-
11.Deelip Khushalrao Jadhav
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
30-Oct-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
23-Jul-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
30-Apr-2025
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: RCS 415/2023 Rajanitai Patil v. Prakash Jadhav – The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating ancestral properties in Nanded district. The court found plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, citing Supreme Court precedent that coparceners cannot prevent proposed alienations by a family Karta (manager); their remedy is only to challenge completed sales. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
27-Mar-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
25-Feb-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
31-Jan-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
16-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
27-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
19-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
19-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
30-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
06-Sep-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
06-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
19-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
23-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
06-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
02-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
20-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
30-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
16-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
10-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
15-Jul-2023
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
19-Jun-2023
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge J.D. Degloor
-
03-May-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt CIVIL Judge Jd Degloor
-
15-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 415/2023
Case Summary: RCS 415/2023 Rajanitai Patil v. Prakash Jadhav – The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating ancestral properties in Nanded district. The court found plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, citing Supreme Court precedent that coparceners cannot prevent proposed alienations by a family Karta (manager); their remedy is only to challenge completed sales. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts