Shankar Devrao Solanke Patil vs Govind Devrao Solanke Patil — 19/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order43Rule1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 09th June 2026.
M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal
CNR: MHND110003652025
e-Filing Number
24-06-2025
Filing Number
252/2025
Filing Date
24-Jun-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
25-Jun-2025
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court Bhokar
Judge
1-District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shankar Devrao Solanke Patil
Adv. Kadam S.C.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Govind Devrao Solanke Patil
-
2.Balaji Devrao Solanke Patil
-
3.Anand Devrao Solanke Patil
-
4.Digambar Devrao Solanke Patil
-
5.Vijaymala Vinayakrao Pawar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: MCA 19/2025 The District Judge dismissed appellant Shankar Devrao Solanke Patil's appeal challenging a temporary injunction order that restrained him from creating third-party rights over disputed ancestral properties, including field Gut no.127. Although appellant claimed Gut no.127 was self-acquired (purchased via 2000 sale deed), the court found a triable issue existed regarding whether joint family funds were used for its purchase, justifying the injunction's continuation pending trial. The court confirmed the lower court's discretion was fairly exercised in balancing both parties' rights and expedited suit hearing to end-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
05-May-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
28-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
17-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
27-Jan-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
13-Jan-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
06-Jan-2026
Hearing Without W.S.
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
22-Dec-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing Without W.S.
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
17-Nov-2025
Appearance
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
29-Oct-2025
Steps_Unready
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
07-Oct-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
26-Sep-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
10-Sep-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
11-Aug-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
22-Jul-2025
Awaiting Notice
District Judge-1 And Additional Sessions Judge Bhokar
-
25-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 19/2025
Case Summary: MCA 19/2025 The District Judge dismissed appellant Shankar Devrao Solanke Patil's appeal challenging a temporary injunction order that restrained him from creating third-party rights over disputed ancestral properties, including field Gut no.127. Although appellant claimed Gut no.127 was self-acquired (purchased via 2000 sale deed), the court found a triable issue existed regarding whether joint family funds were used for its purchase, justifying the injunction's continuation pending trial. The court confirmed the lower court's discretion was fairly exercised in balancing both parties' rights and expedited suit hearing to end-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts