Gajanan Govind nagalwad vs Govind Aabaji Nagalwad Advocate - Auradkar B. D. — 224/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHND100016232023

Filing Number

836/2023

Filing Date

01-Sep-2023

Registration No

224/2023

Registration Date

01-Sep-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Kandhar

Judge

24-Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gajanan Govind nagalwad

    Adv. Shekh Nijam

  2. 2.savitra Sanjay Dubukwad

  3. 3.Lata Santosh Nagalwad

  4. 4.Payal Santosh Nagalwad U/g Lata Santosh Nagalwad

  5. 5.Ashish Santosh Nagalwad U/g Lata Santosh Nagalwad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Govind Aabaji Nagalwad Advocate - Auradkar B. D.

  2. 2.Vandana Govind Nagalwad

  3. 3.Narayan Bhagwat Papinwar

  4. 4.Datta Kishanrao Kamble

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

  6. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

  7. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

  8. 30-Aug-2025

    List of Witness

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

  9. 26-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar

  10. 24-Apr-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: 224/2023 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the petitioners' claims regarding inheritance rights to agricultural land (Survey No. 148/3/A). The court held that respondents 3 and 4 had valid registered deeds and rightful ownership. The petitioners lacked substantive grounds to challenge the property distribution among family members. Petition rejected; case costs imposed on petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 24-Apr-2025

    Documents

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  12. 17-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  13. 11-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  14. 21-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  15. 23-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  16. 09-Dec-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  17. 19-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Order

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  18. 09-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  19. 02-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  20. 04-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  21. 08-May-2024

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  22. 30-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  23. 06-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  24. 13-Feb-2024

    Depositing Amount

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  25. 03-Feb-2024

    Order on Exh

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  26. 30-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  27. 19-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  28. 02-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  29. 20-Nov-2023

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  30. 19-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    III Jt. Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Kandhar

  31. 06-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 01-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 224/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 224/2023 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court rejected the petitioners' claims regarding inheritance rights to agricultural land (Survey No. 148/3/A). The court held that respondents 3 and 4 had valid registered deeds and rightful ownership. The petitioners lacked substantive grounds to challenge the property distribution among family members. Petition rejected; case costs imposed on petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case