Shivaji Vyankati Mulke vs The Nanded District Central Bank Branch kurula tq kandhar On behalf of the Branch Officer — 110/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 372. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 04th May 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHND100003702026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
157/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kandhar
Judge
24-Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivaji Vyankati Mulke
Adv. KAMBLE S.H.
-
2.Tanaji Venkati Mulke
Adv. KAMBLE S.H.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Nanded District Central Bank Branch kurula tq kandhar On behalf of the Branch Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the succession certificate application filed by Shivaji Vyankati Mulke and Tanaji Venkati Mulke under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1872, recognizing them as legal heirs of their deceased father. The petitioners sought the certificate to claim Rs. 54,000 deposited in their father's bank account at Nanded District Central Bank, and the court found their claim valid after the non-responding bank failed to contest the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar
-
29-Apr-2026
Hearing
Jt CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Kandhar
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2026
The court granted the succession certificate application filed by Shivaji Vyankati Mulke and Tanaji Venkati Mulke under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1872, recognizing them as legal heirs of their deceased father. The petitioners sought the certificate to claim Rs. 54,000 deposited in their father's bank account at Nanded District Central Bank, and the court found their claim valid after the non-responding bank failed to contest the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts