Shivraya S/o Viththalrao Yadapalle vs The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - AGP — 47/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHND060003652024

e-Filing Number

18-04-2024

Filing Number

178/2024

Filing Date

19-Apr-2024

Registration No

47/2024

Registration Date

19-Apr-2024

Court

CJSD and CJJD, Biloli

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivraya S/o Viththalrao Yadapalle

    Adv. Jambkar G. P.

  2. 2.Santosh S/o Viththalrao Yadapalle

    Adv. Jambkar G. P.

  3. 3.Laxman S/o Viththalarao Yadapalle

    Adv. Jambkar G. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - AGP

  2. 2.The Village Panchayat Office Tamlur

  3. 3.Zillha Parishad Nanded

  4. 4.Sub Divisional Office

  5. 5.Tahsil Office Degloor

  6. 6.Deputy Superintendent Land Records Deglur

  7. 7.Deepak S/o Digambar Gaikwad

  8. 8.Gangaram S/o Hanmant Gaikwad

  9. 9.Suresh S/o Gangaram Gaikwad

  10. 10.Avinash S/o Yadavrao Bhure

  11. 11.Shivaji S/o Lalu Gadamwar

  12. 12.Sandeep S/o Sayalu Lingdale

  13. 13.Deepak S/o Yadavrao Bhure

  14. 14.Lachchhiram S/o Mashnaji Gaikwad

  15. 15.Nagu S/o Hajjiram Gaddamwar

  16. 16.Gangadhar S/ O Hanmant Gaikwad

  17. 17.Sonba S/o Vithal Vananje

  18. 18.Manohar S/o Lakshman Gaikwad

  19. 19.Ramchandra S/o Lalu Vananje

  20. 20.Shanteshwar S/o Manmathappa Swami

  21. 21.Shivling S/o Manmathappa Swami

  22. 22.Padminbai W/o Manmthappa Swami

  23. 23.Pushpa W/o Basvaraj Swami

  24. 24.Pashamiyan S/o Ahmadsab Shaikh

  25. 25.Raghunath S/o Maruti Jaynar

  26. 26.Hularam S/o Shivaraya Jaynar

  27. 27.Hanmant S/o Shivaraya Jaynar

  28. 28.Sanjay S/o Manikrao Mule

  29. 29.Nagnath S/o Manikrao Mule

  30. 30.Ganpat S/o Ramanna Mule

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  10. 14-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  15. 03-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  16. 20-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  18. 09-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  19. 18-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  20. 07-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  21. 23-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  22. 09-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  23. 26-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  24. 26-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  25. 19-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  26. 12-Mar-2025

    Steps_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  27. 05-Mar-2025

    Steps_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  28. 12-Feb-2025

    Compliance

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  29. 22-Jan-2025

    Compliance

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  30. 21-Dec-2024

    Compliance

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  31. 11-Dec-2024

    Compliance

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  32. 27-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 47/2024, Shivraya Vs. State & Ors. Outcome: The court allowed the application filed by defendants (Nos. 7-14, 17-19, and 28-30) and set aside the "No W.S." (No Written Statement) order passed against them. The defendants were required to pay costs of Rs. 100 each to the plaintiff. Reasoning: The court found that multiple proceedings were pending and defendants required time to collect copies and information. Applying the principle of natural justice (audi alteram partem), the court determined the defendants should not be condemned unheard, thus permitting them to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  33. 27-Nov-2024

    Compliance

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  34. 05-Nov-2024

    Steps_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  35. 09-Oct-2024

    Steps_Unready

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  36. 18-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  37. 21-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  38. 02-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  39. 09-May-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge Sr. DIV. Biloli

  40. 19-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 19-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 47/2024, Shivraya Vs. State & Ors. Outcome: The court allowed the application filed by defendants (Nos. 7-14, 17-19, and 28-30) and set aside the "No W.S." (No Written Statement) order passed against them. The defendants were required to pay costs of Rs. 100 each to the plaintiff. Reasoning: The court found that multiple proceedings were pending and defendants required time to collect copies and information. Applying the principle of natural justice (audi alteram partem), the court determined the defendants should not be condemned unheard, thus permitting them to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case