State of Mah - Akuwa vs Vajesing Mansing Padvi Advocate - Vasave Mahesh D. — 1230/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNB100020582021
Filing Number
1695/2021
Filing Date
08-Dec-2021
Registration No
1230/2021
Registration Date
08-Dec-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Akkalkuwa
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
481
Police Station
Akkalkuwa
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Mah - Akuwa
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vajesing Mansing Padvi Advocate - Vasave Mahesh D.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vajesing Mansing Padvi (Case 1230/2021) Court Decision: The accused Vajesing Mansing Padvi was acquitted and discharged of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for illegal possession and sale of country-made liquor. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges against the accused. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural defects in the investigation: the two panches (witnesses) testified they were never called to the scene, no panchnama (formal record) was prepared in their presence, and no chemical analysis report was available. The prosecution failed to lead evidence from the informant and provided no corroborating forensic evidence, making the case against the accused not proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
13-Jun-2025
N.B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
02-Apr-2025
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
13-Feb-2025
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
18-Dec-2024
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
12-Nov-2024
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
24-Sep-2024
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
08-Jul-2024
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
19-Apr-2024
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
20-Feb-2024
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
12-Jan-2024
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
27-Nov-2023
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
10-Oct-2023
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
02-Sep-2023
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
04-Jul-2023
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
16-May-2023
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
03-Apr-2023
B.W._Unready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
17-Feb-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
18-Jan-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
07-Dec-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
20-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
15-Sep-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
29-Jul-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
05-May-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
08-Mar-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
04-Jan-2022
Appearance
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C.Akkalkuwa
-
08-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 1230/2021
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vajesing Mansing Padvi (Case 1230/2021) Court Decision: The accused Vajesing Mansing Padvi was acquitted and discharged of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for illegal possession and sale of country-made liquor. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges against the accused. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural defects in the investigation: the two panches (witnesses) testified they were never called to the scene, no panchnama (formal record) was prepared in their presence, and no chemical analysis report was available. The prosecution failed to lead evidence from the informant and provided no corroborating forensic evidence, making the case against the accused not proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts