Manilal Rupsing Raul vs Magan Pitamber Raul etc 2 Advocate - Puranik S.V. — 11/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Steps Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNB090006392023

Filing Number

182/2023

Filing Date

12-Jul-2023

Registration No

11/2023

Registration Date

12-Jul-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Taloda

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manilal Rupsing Raul

    Adv. Thakare S. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Magan Pitamber Raul etc 2 Advocate - Puranik S.V.

  2. 2.Banubai Pitamber Raul

    Adv. Puranik S.V.

  3. 3.Rajila Magan Raul

    Adv. Puranik S.V.

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  9. 18-Dec-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  11. 13-Nov-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  13. 22-Sep-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  14. 12-Sep-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  15. 26-Aug-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  16. 24-Jul-2025

    For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  17. 03-Jul-2025

    Report

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  18. 08-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  19. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  20. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  21. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  22. 17-Dec-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  23. 23-Oct-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  24. 24-Sep-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  25. 25-Jul-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  26. 08-Jul-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  27. 04-May-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  28. 12-Mar-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  29. 19-Dec-2023

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  30. 10-Oct-2023

    Filing of Affidavit

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  31. 11-Sep-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary of Case 11/2023 Petitioner: Manilal Rupsing Raul Respondents: Magan Pitamber Raul and others Court: Civil Court (First Class), Taloda, District Nandurbar Date: September 11, 2023 Outcome: The court granted a temporary injunction (interim order) in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner sought protection of his ownership and possession of agricultural land (Plot No. 445, measuring 0.50 hectares) in Shirve village, Taloda taluka. The court found that the petitioner had legally acquired ownership rights over the disputed property through a tribal land rights grant order dated January 19, 2018, and was in actual possession and cultivation of the land. The respondents were restrained from interfering with the petitioner's ownership, possession, and enjoyment of the property. The court held that the balance of convenience favored the petitioner, as denying relief would deprive him of his rightful property while granting relief posed no financial hardship to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 11-Sep-2023

    Filing of Affidavit

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  33. 04-Sep-2023

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  34. 31-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  35. 24-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  36. 10-Aug-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  37. 05-Aug-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  38. 24-Jul-2023

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c.taloda

  39. 12-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 12-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 11/2023 Petitioner: Manilal Rupsing Raul Respondents: Magan Pitamber Raul and others Court: Civil Court (First Class), Taloda, District Nandurbar Date: September 11, 2023 Outcome: The court granted a temporary injunction (interim order) in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner sought protection of his ownership and possession of agricultural land (Plot No. 445, measuring 0.50 hectares) in Shirve village, Taloda taluka. The court found that the petitioner had legally acquired ownership rights over the disputed property through a tribal land rights grant order dated January 19, 2018, and was in actual possession and cultivation of the land. The respondents were restrained from interfering with the petitioner's ownership, possession, and enjoyment of the property. The court held that the balance of convenience favored the petitioner, as denying relief would deprive him of his rightful property while granting relief posed no financial hardship to the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case