Kumbharya Khajya Pawara,Ors.-10 vs Bahadarya Kalya Pawara,Ors.- 5 Advocate - Vasave M.H. — 48/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.-39,Rule-1&2. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNB070009082022

Filing Number

166/2022

Filing Date

14-Sep-2022

Registration No

48/2022

Registration Date

14-Sep-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dhadgaon

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O.-39,Rule-1&2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kumbharya Khajya Pawara,Ors.-10

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  2. 2.Jalabibai w/o Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  3. 3.Babita Bap Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  4. 4.Kusha Bap Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  5. 5.Hiralal Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  6. 6.Virsing Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  7. 7.Thutya Bap Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  8. 8.Sangita Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  9. 9.Jyoti Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  10. 10.Kalpana Kumbharya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

  11. 11.Khajya Ferangya Pawara

    Adv. Pawara V. O.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bahadarya Kalya Pawara,Ors.- 5 Advocate - Vasave M.H.

  2. 2.Tersing Bahadarya Pawara

  3. 3.Oparya Janglya Pawara

  4. 4.Dilip Oparya Pawara

  5. 5.Khalpa Oparya Pawara

  6. 6.Udaya Oparya Pawara

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 48/2022 Court Decision: The suit for perpetual injunction is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that plaintiffs have exclusive lawful possession of 3.25 hectares of forest land (compartment 321) in Kanjyapani, and that defendants illegally intruded and obstructed their possession in June-July 2022. Defendants are perpetually restrained from disturbing plaintiffs' possession and ordered to bear all suit costs. Key Reasoning: The court determined that defendants failed to establish their counterclaim despite possessing separate land in the same compartment, evidenced by conflicting boundary descriptions in their parallel suit. Plaintiffs proved possession through Forest Rights documentation (2010), credible witness testimony, and defendants' own admission of the land dispute before the Tahsildar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  9. 24-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  10. 10-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  13. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  14. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  16. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  17. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  18. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  19. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  20. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  21. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  22. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  23. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  24. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  25. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  26. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  27. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  28. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  29. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  30. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  31. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  32. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  33. 04-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  34. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  35. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  36. 26-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  37. 02-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  38. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  39. 07-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  40. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  41. 18-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  42. 18-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  43. 31-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  44. 13-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  45. 18-Apr-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  46. 18-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  47. 31-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  48. 02-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  49. 12-Dec-2022

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  50. 20-Oct-2022

    W.S. and Say

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  51. 14-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 14-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 48/2022 Court Decision: The suit for perpetual injunction is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that plaintiffs have exclusive lawful possession of 3.25 hectares of forest land (compartment 321) in Kanjyapani, and that defendants illegally intruded and obstructed their possession in June-July 2022. Defendants are perpetually restrained from disturbing plaintiffs' possession and ordered to bear all suit costs. Key Reasoning: The court determined that defendants failed to establish their counterclaim despite possessing separate land in the same compartment, evidenced by conflicting boundary descriptions in their parallel suit. Plaintiffs proved possession through Forest Rights documentation (2010), credible witness testimony, and defendants' own admission of the land dispute before the Tahsildar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case