GOVIND SIMA TADVI vs Nill — 4/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Dismissal Order Next hearing 02-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHNB070000142026

e-Filing Number

12-01-2026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dhadgaon

Judge

1-C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVIND SIMA TADVI

    Adv. VALVI DHIRSING GIMBYA

  2. 2.SUBHASH SIMA TADVI

    Adv. VALVI DHIRSING GIMBYA

  3. 3.GOVA SIMA TADVI

    Adv. VALVI DHIRSING GIMBYA

  4. 4.RAVINDARA SIMA TADVI

    Adv. VALVI DHIRSING GIMBYA

  5. 5.MASALIBAI SIMA TADVI

    Adv. VALVI DHIRSING GIMBYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nill

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 4/2026 The application for a Legal Heirs Certificate under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 Act was adjourned. The court found that the applicants failed to take necessary steps in the matter and scheduled the case for a dismissal order on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Dismissal Order

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Notification / Publication

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Notification / Publication

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Notification / Publication

    C.J.J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dhadgaon

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Order on Exhibit

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Civil M.A. No. 4/2026 The application for a Legal Heirs Certificate under Section 2 of the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 Act was adjourned. The court found that the applicants failed to take necessary steps in the matter and scheduled the case for a dismissal order on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case