Mustakim Din Mohammad vs Harshit Vyas and TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Dichwalkar A. V. — 1781/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 140,166,Injury. Status: STEPS UNREADY. Next hearing: 06th May 2026 Date Not Updated.

MACP - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHMT010020242023

STEPS UNREADY

Next Hearing

06th May 2026 Date Not Updated

Filing Number

2530/2023

Filing Date

07-10-2023

Registration No

1781/2023

Registration Date

13-12-2023

Court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

Judge

3-H. H. Member

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 140,166,Injury

Petitioner(s)

Mustakim Din Mohammad

Adv. Kamble N. B.

Respondent(s)

Harshit Vyas and TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Dichwalkar A. V.

TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-H. H. Member

12-03-2026

STEPS UNREADY

24-02-2026

ORDER ON EXH._____READY

13-01-2026

SAY HEARING ON EXH.____READY

17-11-2025

RETURN OF NOTICE

04-10-2025

RETURN OF NOTICE

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Order on Exh.

Case Summary: M.A.C.P. 1781/2023 Outcome: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the insurer's application seeking dismissal of Mustakim Din Mohammad's compensation claim for alleged injuries from a motor accident dated March/April 2023. The tribunal held that the claim petition cannot be dismissed at the threshold merely on limitation grounds under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, despite being filed in October 2023 (beyond the six-month statutory period). The tribunal found that limitation issues involve mixed questions of law and fact unsuitable for summary rejection, and that the Motor Vehicles Act's beneficial nature and statutory framework under Sections 159 and 166(4) require substantive justice over technical dismissal. All contentions on merits remain open for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.A.C.P. 1781/2023 Outcome: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the insurer's application seeking dismissal of Mustakim Din Mohammad's compensation claim for alleged injuries from a motor accident dated March/April 2023. The tribunal held that the claim petition cannot be dismissed at the threshold merely on limitation grounds under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, despite being filed in October 2023 (beyond the six-month statutory period). The tribunal found that limitation issues involve mixed questions of law and fact unsuitable for summary rejection, and that the Motor Vehicles Act's beneficial nature and statutory framework under Sections 159 and 166(4) require substantive justice over technical dismissal. All contentions on merits remain open for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case