Mustakim Din Mohammad vs Harshit Vyas and TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Dichwalkar A. V. — 1781/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 140,166,Injury. Status: STEPS UNREADY. Next hearing: 06th May 2026 Date Not Updated.
MACP - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHMT010020242023
Next Hearing
06th May 2026 Date Not Updated
Filing Number
2530/2023
Filing Date
07-10-2023
Registration No
1781/2023
Registration Date
13-12-2023
Court
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Judge
3-H. H. Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mustakim Din Mohammad
Adv. Kamble N. B.
Respondent(s)
Harshit Vyas and TATA AIG Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Dichwalkar A. V.
TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-H. H. Member
STEPS UNREADY
ORDER ON EXH._____READY
SAY HEARING ON EXH.____READY
RETURN OF NOTICE
RETURN OF NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | STEPS UNREADY |
| 24-02-2026 | ORDER ON EXH._____READY |
| 13-01-2026 | SAY HEARING ON EXH.____READY |
| 17-11-2025 | RETURN OF NOTICE |
| 04-10-2025 | RETURN OF NOTICE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. 1781/2023 Outcome: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the insurer's application seeking dismissal of Mustakim Din Mohammad's compensation claim for alleged injuries from a motor accident dated March/April 2023. The tribunal held that the claim petition cannot be dismissed at the threshold merely on limitation grounds under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, despite being filed in October 2023 (beyond the six-month statutory period). The tribunal found that limitation issues involve mixed questions of law and fact unsuitable for summary rejection, and that the Motor Vehicles Act's beneficial nature and statutory framework under Sections 159 and 166(4) require substantive justice over technical dismissal. All contentions on merits remain open for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. 1781/2023 Outcome: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the insurer's application seeking dismissal of Mustakim Din Mohammad's compensation claim for alleged injuries from a motor accident dated March/April 2023. The tribunal held that the claim petition cannot be dismissed at the threshold merely on limitation grounds under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, despite being filed in October 2023 (beyond the six-month statutory period). The tribunal found that limitation issues involve mixed questions of law and fact unsuitable for summary rejection, and that the Motor Vehicles Act's beneficial nature and statutory framework under Sections 159 and 166(4) require substantive justice over technical dismissal. All contentions on merits remain open for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts