Monisha Walter Pereira vs Rushabh N. Sanghavi — 208/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP. DKST.

CNR: MHMT010019012024

Filing Number

1785/2024

Filing Date

23-Jul-2024

Registration No

208/2024

Registration Date

06-Aug-2024

Court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

Judge

3-H. H. Member

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Monisha Walter Pereira

    Adv. Chitte S. Z.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rushabh N. Sanghavi

  2. 2.United India Insurance Co. Ltd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh.

    SUMMARY The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mumbai dismissed an execution application filed by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. seeking recovery of ₹11,45,483 from judgment debtor Rishabh Sanghvi. The tribunal held that while the insurer had validly issued a warrant for attachment of movable property, the warrant remained unexecuted and the insurer failed to take fresh, effective steps despite repeated opportunities over an extended period. The court ruled that execution proceedings cannot remain indefinitely pending without meaningful progress, emphasizing that decree holders must remain diligent and furnish concrete, actionable particulars. However, the insurer was granted liberty to file a fresh execution application with proper particulars regarding the debtor's current whereabouts, bank details, and attachable assets, subject to limitation laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    H. H. Member

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Steps Unready

    H. H. Member

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Steps Unready

    H. H. Member

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Steps Unready

    H. H. Member

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Warrant

    H. H. Member

  8. 03-Nov-2025

    Warrant

    H. H. Member

  9. 14-Oct-2025

    Steps Unready

    H. H. Member

  10. 15-Sep-2025

    Steps Unready

    H. H. Member

  11. 30-Jul-2025

    Steps Unready

    H. H. Member

  12. 17-Jun-2025

    Steps Unready

    H. H. Member

  13. 25-Apr-2025

    Report

    H. H. Member

  14. 21-Mar-2025

    Report

    H. H. Member

  15. 21-Feb-2025

    Report

    H. H. Member

  16. 08-Jan-2025

    Report

    H. H. Member

  17. 13-Nov-2024

    Report

    H. H. Member

  18. 07-Oct-2024

    Report

    H. H. Member

  19. 09-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 23-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mumbai dismissed an execution application filed by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. seeking recovery of ₹11,45,483 from judgment debtor Rishabh Sanghvi. The tribunal held that while the insurer had validly issued a warrant for attachment of movable property, the warrant remained unexecuted and the insurer failed to take fresh, effective steps despite repeated opportunities over an extended period. The court ruled that execution proceedings cannot remain indefinitely pending without meaningful progress, emphasizing that decree holders must remain diligent and furnish concrete, actionable particulars. However, the insurer was granted liberty to file a fresh execution application with proper particulars regarding the debtor's current whereabouts, bank details, and attachable assets, subject to limitation laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case